Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 15, 2021

The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as GH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.)

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184
(cherry picked from commit 074e765)

Co-authored-by: T. Wouters [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184

…dealloc (pythonGH-27165)

The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as pythonGH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.)

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184
(cherry picked from commit 074e765)

Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Yhg1s: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Yhg1s: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@Yhg1s
Copy link
Member

Yhg1s commented Jul 15, 2021

Another transient network failure, unrelated to the change.

@Yhg1s Yhg1s merged commit 0b47049 into python:3.9 Jul 15, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-074e765-3.9 branch July 15, 2021 23:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants