Skip to content

Conversation

@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented Feb 1, 2022

@iritkatriel iritkatriel requested a review from pitrou February 1, 2022 10:09
Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I've never been very acquainted with the property implementation. @rhettinger Do you want to take a look?

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @iritkatriel for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @iritkatriel for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31886 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Mar 14, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31887 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
hello-adam pushed a commit to hello-adam/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
@iritkatriel iritkatriel deleted the bpo-43721 branch October 18, 2022 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants