F-strings docs: link to Format Specifiers

[Mariatta]

Link to the Format Specification Mini Language section from f-strings' documentation.

[miss-islington]

Thanks @Mariatta for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-bot]

GH-4889 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

[ChrisBarker-NOAA]

great addition, but it would also be good to explicitly state, without having to follow a link, that f-strings use the same format mini-langage as the .format() method. Maybe:

These nested fields may include their own conversion fields and format specifiers, but may not include more deeply-nested replacement fields. The :ref:format specifier mini-language <formatspec> is the same as that used by the string .format() method.

maybe put the ref in the seconds sentence?

[Mariatta]

Makes sense :) I'll make another PR later today.

[ChrisBarker-NOAA]

Are f-strings only documented in the lexical analysis part of the language reference? I"m not sure newbies will find that.

They should probably be mentioned here:

https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=string%20literal#text-sequence-type-str

I do see a link to the string literal page of lexical analysis there, so if it's at least mentioned, that may do it.

maybe:

"""
See :refString and Bytes literals <proper ref here> for more about the various forms of string literal, including supported escape sequences, the r (“raw”) prefix that disables most escape sequence processing, and the f (f-string) prefix that provides :ref:formatted string literals <ref_to_formatted_sring_literals_section>.

[Mariatta]

Yes this is indeed the documentation for f-strings.
It is referenced from PEP 498's section in What's New in Python 3.6.
f-string is also a terminology in the Glossary, linking back to this page.