Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 3, 2018

Previously the module name was used, which broke relative imports when pdb was run against a plain module or submodule.
(cherry picked from commit 38bfa84)

Co-authored-by: Mario Corchero [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue32691

…H-5474)

Previously the module name was used, which broke relative imports when pdb was run against a plain module or submodule.
(cherry picked from commit 38bfa84)

Co-authored-by: Mario Corchero <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariocj89 and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariocj89 and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 1a0239e into python:3.7 Feb 4, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @ncoghlan!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-38bfa84-3.7 branch February 4, 2018 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants