Skip to content

Conversation

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Jun 21, 2018

Calling Py_Initialize() twice does nothing, instead of failing with a
fatal error: restore the Python 3.6 behaviour.

https://bugs.python.org/issue33932

Calling Py_Initialize() twice does nothing, instead of failing with a
fatal error: restore the Python 3.6 behaviour.
Exit early if Python is already initialized. Revert my previous
change in _Py_InitializeCore().
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

Oops, I didn't ran the test before pushing. Shame on my. It should be better with the second commit :-)

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Would you mind to have a look at this change? It seems to fix a regression introduced in Python 3.7: https://bugs.python.org/issue33932

I'm not sure that it has been made on purpose. At least, it broke an application in the wild...

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-7859 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2018
Calling Py_Initialize() twice does nothing, instead of failing with a
fatal error: restore the Python 3.6 behaviour.
(cherry picked from commit 209abf7)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
@vstinner vstinner deleted the py_init branch June 22, 2018 17:26
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2018
Calling Py_Initialize() twice does nothing, instead of failing with a
fatal error: restore the Python 3.6 behaviour.
(cherry picked from commit 209abf7)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
ned-deily pushed a commit to ned-deily/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2018
Calling Py_Initialize() twice does nothing, instead of failing with a
fatal error: restore the Python 3.6 behaviour.
(cherry picked from commit 209abf7)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants