[3.7] bpo-28626: rearrange discussion of output formatting to encourage f-strings (GH-6036) #8174
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The 'output formatting' section of the tutorial talks a lot about manual formatting with things like .rjust() and .zfill(), with only a passing reference to 3.6's new f-strings.
This doesn't drop all of the old material, but it does rearrange the topics into a more modern order: f-strings first, discussing formatting specifiers a bit; then calling .format(); finally manual formatting with .ljust().
(cherry picked from commit ced350b)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Kuchling [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue28626