Skip to content

Conversation

@clue
Copy link
Member

@clue clue commented Mar 25, 2018

Builds on top of #130

@clue clue added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Mar 25, 2018
@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus requested review from WyriHaximus and jsor March 25, 2018 20:14
* that are subject to discontinuous time adjustments (time jumps).
* This means that if you schedule a timer to trigger in 30s and then adjust
* your system time forward by 20s, the timer SHOULD still trigger in 30s.
* See also [event loop implementations](#loop-implementations) for more details.
Copy link
Member

@jsor jsor Mar 26, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reference can probably omitted here in the docblock or link to README.md#loop-implementations

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair point. This only consistently applies the same changes from #130 to this method. Does it make sense for you to keep this as-is for now and look into all these references in a follow-up PR? 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants