Rollup of 7 pull requests #114308
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #114308
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…istent with `Mutex` and `RwLock` `Mutex` prints `<locked>` as a field value when its inner value cannot be accessed, but the lazy types print a fixed string like "`OnceCell(Uninit)`". This could cause confusion if the inner type is a unit type named `Uninit` and does not respect the pretty-printing flag. With this change, the format message is now "`OnceCell(<uninit>)`", consistent with `Mutex`.
Like the other CStr and CString error types, make a re-export for std::ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError. This seems to have slipped through the cracks in the cstr_from_bytes_until_nul implementation and core_c_str migration. Tracking Issue: rust-lang#95027
…tolnay Make `Debug` representations of `[Lazy, Once]*[Cell, Lock]` consistent with `Mutex` and `RwLock` `Mutex` prints `<locked>` as a field value when its inner value cannot be accessed, but the lazy types print a fixed string like "`OnceCell(Uninit)`". This could cause confusion if the inner type is a unit type named `Uninit` and does not respect the pretty-printing flag. With this change, the format message is now "`OnceCell(<uninit>)`", consistent with `Mutex`.
…r=dtolnay Re-export core::ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError in std::ffi Like the other CStr and CString error types, make a re-export for std::ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError. This seems to have slipped through the cracks in the cstr_from_bytes_until_nul implementation and core_c_str migration. Tracking Issue: rust-lang#95027
…mulacrum Resolve correct archive version name in `opt-dist` Should resolve the master part of rust-lang#113784. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Add missing rvalues to smir Added few missing rvalues to smir, not entirely confident about changes to `Aggregate` cc rust-lang/project-stable-mir#13 r? `@oli-obk`
…lcnr clean up after 113312 Minor edits for rust-lang#113312 cc ``@RalfJung`` r? ``@lcnr``
…earth Update lexer emoji diagnostics to Unicode 15.0 This replaces the `unic-emoji-char` dep tree (which hasn't been updated for a while) with `unicode-properties` crate which contains Unicode 15.0 data. Improves diagnostics for added emoji characters in recent years. (See tests). cc rust-lang#101840 cc ``@Manishearth``
…-then-upcast, r=lcnr Detect trait upcasting through struct tail unsizing in new solver select Oops, we were able to hide trait upcasting behind a parent unsize goal that evaluated to `Certainty::Yes`. Let's do rematching for `Certainty::Yes` unsize goals with `BuiltinImplSource::Misc` sources (corresponding to all of the other unsize rules) to make sure we end up selecting any nested goals which may be satisfied via `BuiltinImplSource::TraitUpcasting` or `::TupleUnsizing`. r? ``@lcnr``
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: db7ff98a72 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Aug 1, 2023
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (706a4d9): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 651.049s -> 651.969s (0.14%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
11 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Debugrepresentations of[Lazy, Once]*[Cell, Lock]consistent withMutexandRwLock#109318 (MakeDebugrepresentations of[Lazy, Once]*[Cell, Lock]consistent withMutexandRwLock)opt-dist#113804 (Resolve correct archive version name inopt-dist)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup