Skip to content

Conversation

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pcwalton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This deref coercions is actually referring to this RFC rather than existing syntax. It may be worth calling it out a little more perhaps.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm yeah. At the same time, don't want to make it too verbose...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps this could avoid using (&*foo) explicitly? Eventually it'll in theory just be &foo to coerce to &str from &String.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexcrichton updated to remove the &*foo

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 29e5d8d rollup

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 29e5d8d into rust-lang:master Jan 22, 2015
@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the deprecation branch October 25, 2017 18:28
lnicola added a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
minor: Use 'deferred task' terminology consistently
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants