Skip to content

Conversation

@sugar700
Copy link
Contributor

@sugar700 sugar700 commented Oct 17, 2017

Just a note, for this to work, T doesn't have to Copy, Clone is sufficient. For instance, the following works.

fn x(a: &[String; 100]) -> [String; 100] {
    a.clone()
}

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @dtolnay (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 17, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@steveklabnik steveklabnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thank you!

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 17, 2017

📌 Commit 8528508 has been approved by steveklabnik

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2017
Update array documentation for Clone trait changes

Just a note, for this to work, `T` doesn't have to `Copy`, `Clone` is sufficient. For instance, the following works.

```rust
fn x(a: &[String; 100]) -> [String; 100] {
    a.clone()
}
```
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2017
Rollup of 10 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45097, #45151, #45307, #45308, #45310, #45315, #45321, #45329, #45338, #45339
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 8528508 into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants