I thought with my limited amount of cricket history, I should pick one as well. I dont have any info on how good and great the old legends lke Jack Hobbs or Ken Barrington or anyone else listed in the probables.
Futile excersise to form a test team across different eras who played in different conditions and against limited teams.
For example in 1940s and 1950s there were just 6 Test teams with India and Pakistan getting very little test cricket. England, Australia ruled the roost followed by West Indies and South Africa.
Still doing the excersise.
In my team I shall have 2 openers, 4 batsmen, 1 wicket keeper, 4 bowlers.
There are some ridiculous entries in the probables list just cos the all time XI is going to be from the list of countries all time great players. WTB!!
A lot like Marvan PattaAttu who played great against minnows and on flat track conditions. Sangakara, MJ figure and VVS does not just cos KS Mj are greats for their country (are they really?) and VVS did nt make it.
Kumar Sangakara making it to test wicketkeepers list, he does not even keep this days. He just peeps and beeps.
Rashid Latif over Wasim Bari. Ludicrous.
Openers
It has to be Virender Sehwag at 1. He just redefined the opening batting in 2000s with his aggressive strokeplay. Not only he makes big hundreds but makes them fairly fast giving a chance to his team to bowl out the opposition. And he does not fear short balls. He can defend too, he can bat for long hours and across days. He has had fastest triple centuries and is just one of the 3 to make 2 triple centuries. I dont have any doubt that very soon he shall go on to become only man to hit 3 or 4 triple centuries and who knows one fine day he would break Brian Lara's record of 400* too.
1. Virender Sehwag
I dont know about the old legends like Len Hutton, Vic Trumper, Hunte, Hanif etc. So wont get them in.
Who wont make it are Jayasuriya, Attapattu, Anwar, Smith,Turner, Richards etc.
2nd opener would be one of Greenidge and Gavaskar. Greenidge had Haynes to his company and the batting lineup followed Richardson, Richards, Lloyd, Logie at different times and an awesome fierce pace attack.
Gavaskar had almost none to his credit for most part of his career. For his first 8 years of Test cricket he did not have a genuine fast bowler. Only in 1978 he had Kapil Dev who sensationally changed the landscape of fast bowling in the country. All he had was ball shine removers and 4 great spinners who would excel only in spin friendly conditions at home and would flop abroad. In 1980s India had a lean run in Tests when they hardly won anything in 31 odd tests. And then some respectable batting came along in form of Vishy, Vengy. Gavaskar would bat long, make runs and give some pride to Indian Test cricket which at the time of his debut was rilled with inferior complex and none of the world class players.
My 2nd opener would be Gavaskar for the sheer amount of change he brought to Indian Test batting.
2. Sunil Gavaskar
Middle Order
The options are: Arjuna Ranatunga, Bert Sutcliffe, Brian Lara, Dudley Nourse, George Headley, Graeme Pollock, Greg Chappell, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Jacques Kallis, Javed Miandad, Ken Barrington, Kevin Pietersen, Mahela Jayawardene, Martin Crowe, Martin Donnelly, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Sir Donald Bradman, Sir Viv Richards, Vijay Hazare, Wally Hammond, Zaheer Abbas
No info on Hammond, Sutcliffe, Nourse, Headley, Pollock, Donnelly etc.
# 3: A lot of modern day contenders for # 3 spot. Ponting (he did not make it), Dravid, Kallis, Lara, Sangakara and all.
But one man pips all of them. Sir Don Bradman. 99.94 is the number on itself that would make him get the # 3 slot.
3. Sir Don Bradman
#4. Contenders for # 4 are Jayawardhene, Crowe, Inzamam, Kevin Pieterson and all.
The unanimous choice for this slot is none but Sachin Tendulkar. No need to mention the reason why he pips all of them. MJ is no comparison for him. Even though he has got 28 hundreds, a lot of them carry no value cos they have come on flat pancakes of SSC, Premdasa and against BD, Zim and other countries in SL. Javed Miandad, Inzy and others were good batters but they fade before Tendulkar.
4. Sachin Tendulkar
Number 5 and 6 are tricky. I would not go for specialist batsmen in the history of the game who batted on this numbers and scored runs. I'd rather chose players on who can play good on any number.
I would have Brian Lara at 5. Awesome batsman, part of mediocre team of Windies post 1995 domination. Had great reagainst Australia, the best team of his generation like Tendulkar. He played a great deal of gems against Australia and other teams but the ones that stand out are 277 in Sydney, his fest hundred and the twin hundreds in 1999 series vs Australia that happened the rest of the batsmen in the team folded and he single handedly won his team 2 Tests.
And of course has 375 and 400 but they did not fetch wins for his team, so they dont figure that high in the list. He rattled Muralitharan every time he played against SL. Just cos he was a part of poor team, the runs agaisnt Murali were not enough to win Tests against them.
5. Brian Lara
# 6 for Jacques Kallis, the highest run getter for SA and a more than useful bowler.
He does not figure in the allrounder category but he would always pitch in as 5th bowthe team and mostly as 3rd pacer.
6. Jacques Kallis.
The rest of the team in 2nd part.
Team thus far:
1. Sehwag
2. Gavaskar
3. Bradman
4. Tendulkar
5. Lara
6. Kallis