cellio: (Default)

In my last post I talked about the sudden death of my Android phone (again) and my pursuit of an iPhone, which was stymied not by Apple but by T-Mobile. That was Thursday. On Friday morning I returned to the Apple store soon after opening time, this time with a backpack full of auxiliary hardware (tablet for an authenticator app, old mostly-broken phone that could still take a physical SIM card, iPad for Apple login on another device, and by the way my existing phone charger to confirm I didn't need to buy a new one).

It took almost two hours, but we got past the T-Mobile hurdles so I could walk out of the store with a working phone. I'd already decided there was no way I was buying it from T-Mobile (and I suspect it would be locked if I did), and neither I nor the employee who was helping me felt good about "buy it here, take it there, hope they do the right thing". I have many colorful things to say about T-Mobile...later.

For the locals: Mikey in the Shadyside Apple store is fabulous. This was customer service way above and beyond what I've experienced at other tech providers. Mikey was knowledgeable, empathetic, and cheerful even when T-Mobile was screwing with us. I really hope the feedback I gave on the customer-service survey contributes to Mikey getting some recognition. And this is in stark contrast to previous phone vendors, who, if you can get a human at all, will just tell you to ship the phone back to them at your expense, or buy a newer model, or otherwise do what is convenient for the vendor but not the customer.

I bought the iPhone 16E; it's the most affordable current model, but it's still a lot more than I've paid for a phone before. On the other hand, Dani has had his current iPhone for a lot longer than I had my previous Pixels (both of them). Maybe a mid-range phone costs $100/year and the replacement schedules are different between Android and iOS.

So, the actual iPhone. I've used an iPad, so I was a little familiar with the environment, but using a phone is different in some important ways. There are definitely things I'm not used to; some might be better, some worse, and many merely different and I just need to get acclimated. Initial stream-of-consciousness impressions:

Setup was pretty straightforward, carrier issues aside. No surprises from the first phone call and first text message. I couldn't import anything from my dead Android phone, but the iPhone knew about apps I had installed on the iPad, so that helped. I can access anything in Google's cloud storage by installing their apps (e.g. for photos). I haven't figured out if I can recover text messages.

The default keyboard does not include period and comma on the main screen. What the hell? Is this why so many text messages blow off punctuation?

I am used to a global "back" button, not just for browsers but for everything -- pop out of map navigation (while staying in the map app), go back to your photo gallery from looking at an individual photo, etc, with the top-level "back" being "exit the app". Apple does none of that -- they rely on the individual apps to provide navigation, so if an app doesn't have the "back" concept, you can't do anything. And apps, of course, can and do change the UI -- maybe there's a "back" button and maybe it's in the top left corner, or maybe you're expected to navigate by controls across the bottom for different views, or maybe it's something else. Android apps had those variations too, but there was always the phone-level "back" button. I miss it.

There's also no "home" button (take me back to the desktop). You leave an app by swiping up from the bottom of the screen. I sometimes have to try a couple times; I haven't yet found the magic "sweet spot".

There is a gesture, also involving swipe up from the bottom, to see all the apps that are running and allow you to really close individual apps. This was the third sticky button on Android. I haven't quite figured this out on the iPhone yet; sometimes I stumble into it, and often the screen shakes at me to tell me it didn't understand what I was trying to do. Learning curve... Also on the learning curve: apparently on the iPhone you swipe left to dismiss notifications, not right? Neither is better; it's just an adjustment.

Settings are weird. A lot of apps don't have any control for accessing settings, even when apps clearly have settings. I had to ask Mikey about that. It turns out that the system-level settings -- where you control things like display, sound, passcodes, etc -- also has a section for app settings. To add a non-default calendar to the calendar app, instead of using the non-existent in-app settings, I go to Settings -> Apps -> Calendar and poke around in there. On the other hand, some apps do have in-app settings, so you have to hunt around for them.

Apple is very much still in the world of "we think this design is intuitive and therefore you don't need any assistance". I had to do web searches to find documentation on what some of the glyphs mean. There's a "control center" (similar to Android) where you have quick access to things like toggling Wifi, Bluetooth, and dark mode, and changing brightness and text size and volume, and a bunch of other stuff. The iPhone offers more options than Android and the layout is highly customizable. They have some cute ideas, like apparently there's some tool for "identify the music that's currently playing", which I think means in your environment and not Spotify, but I haven't explored it yet. Almost all of this involves graphics not text, though, and not all of their choices are as obvious to me as they were to their designers. There are three "disconnected box around a thing" glyphs; one's a QR-code scanner, one's a "tell me what this thing is" (uses camera and probably AI), and I'm not yet sure what the third one is.

This is me, so we have to talk about visual accessibility. This was the very first thing I tested in the store on Thursday, 'cause if that didn't work, nothing else mattered and I'd have to head back to Androidville. Mixed review here: adequate with some compromises, but there is more work to be done here. Specifically, fonts: there are two font-related toggles, normal/bigger and normal/bold. These affect displays in apps that pay attention to them, which they don't have to. Also, apparently the OS is not an app in this sense; nothing I did changed the text labels for the apps on the home screens. The text is "one size fits all". Yeah, you can reportedly magnify your entire screen, but that's not what I want (too much collateral damage). I mitigated this by changing the desktop from their colorful interferes-with-text wallpaper to solid gray. Unlike my Android devices, the iPhone doesn't have a built-in library of wallpapers; there's the default, or you can use a photo, or you can set a solid color. So, solid color it is; I'd've preferred something with a little more character (but also legibility), a balance I struck on Android, but oh well -- it's just wallpaper, not something important.

There was something small and light gray that Mikey had to point out to me in the store (would have missed it entirely), but I can't now remember what it was. I suspect there will be more of that sort of thing.

Ok, apps. I was migrating from Android, so I couldn't just bring all my apps with me. There are iOS versions of most of the apps I used (not always identical), so I just had to look them up individually in the App Store and install them. Initially I did this from memory, which was frustrating, but then it occurred to me to ask my Android tablet if it could tell me about apps that weren't on that tablet but that I'd used. The answer to that turned out to be "yes". Some things I haven't found equivalents for yet; this will be a background process for a while, I expect. Critical stuff is mostly in place (I need to have a conversation with my bank about their app); nice-to-haves are trickling in.

I'm trying out some of the native Apple apps, particularly ones that could replace Google apps. Some differences are strange: in the Apple calendar app, how in the world do you get it to show you a month view like Google Calendar? I can get it to show me a couple days at a time (in list form, like a week view but not all week), but I want the month view. I haven't tried out the Apple apps for photos and maps yet, but plan to soon. The note-taking app seems fine so far. I can't imagine using Pages, Sheets, or Keynote on a phone, but they came pre-installed.

I couldn't figure out how to use Apple's email app with multiple accounts, but that's ok; I used Thunderbird on my Android phone, so I'll just install...what do you mean there's no Thunderbird app for iOS? (Beta coming soon, they say.) Ok, I found another client that'll do. Still hoping for Thunderbird later; I liked it on my previous phone and also use it on my desktop Mac.

My Android phone had a fingerprint reader for unlocking. It was flaky, so I often ended up having to enter my passcode. This iPhone has Face ID, and so far it's worked flawlessly for me. I asked Mikey how to temporarily disable it for situations where I'm worried about it being used against me (hostile agent has physical possession of your phone -- we can all imagine scenarios, I'm sure), and he pointed out that it always requires the passcode after restart. Good to know.

Speaking of restarting... I had to search the web. Mikey did tell me how to turn the phone off, but apparently I'd misremembered. On my old phone, a long press on the power button brought up a menu; on my newer Android tablet, you have to do it in software as far as I can tell; on the iPhone both are possible but the physical option involves both the power button and a volume button and then an on-screen slider. I guess people don't restart (or turn off) phones very often?

It's only been a few days (and one of those was Shabbat, a no-phone day), but so far the experience of actually using the phone has been smooth. It feels comfortable and even pleasant at times. My Pixel's 5G connection was sometimes flaky and would drop out at the most inconvenient of times (like while trying to navigate); I haven't taken my new phone on any big outings yet, but so far I'm not seeing these problems when out and about. There are some initial weirdnesses, but I think I'm going to like this a lot better than my Pixel.

More thoughts later as I settle in.

gremlins

Dec. 18th, 2025 11:47 pm
cellio: (Default)

Today while I was using my phone (Pixel) in a perfectly ordinary way, the screen went black and soon after the phone stopped responding at all. I tried all the usual diagnostics and remedies to no avail, then took it to Google's favored repair shop. (The phone's out of warranty so that doesn't matter, but it was also the closest option and they do work on Pixels.) My hopes for a loose connection were dashed when the guy said the motherboard had failed, this is a common problem with the Pixel 5A, it can't be fixed, and I need a new phone. Oh joy...

I bought a Pixel when my previous phone decided that holding a charge is not strictly required. I chose a Pixel in part because I was tired of vendor bloatware and I wanted generic Android. That phone failed two weeks before the end of the warranty, so Google replaced it. I've had this Pixel for less than three years. And here we are again.

I've had other problems with this phone, and some with my previous Android phone too. When I inherited an iPad this summer I took it as a chance to explore iOS. Some things are certainly different, some cryptic, and some hindered by Apple's design philosophy, but it seems a reasonable option. Dani is happy with his iPhone and showed me some of the things I hadn't yet figured out. It appears that most of the apps I use have iOS versions, and I can probably find reasonable alternatives for most of the rest (Tusky I'll miss you), and not having a working phone is a problem. So I decided to change teams.

The problems came from unexpected sources.

I went to the Apple store, worked with a very helpful and clueful person there, and was making good progress when I asked where the tray for the SIM card is. No physical SIM cards; that's all digital. Ok, I said, and we transfer my phone number and stuff how? No worries; they can do that at the Apple store. I just need to open the T-Mobile app on my phone and... oh right, we'll need to do that from a computer. Off we go, I log in (I'd made sure I knew my T-Mobile password), and... 2FA. They want to send a code to my phone. The phone that can't show a code. I asked if we could maybe, just for a minute, move my SIM card to some other phone they might have lying around, but no luck. The web site had a second option, an authenticator app, which is on my phone...

I do have that app also installed on my tablet, because I worry about single points of failure. I hadn't thought to bring my tablet with me (smacks forehead) and there wasn't enough time to fetch it and still get my iPhone today, but the employee suggested that I could also buy the phone at a T-Mobile store and they'd be able to validate my identity and move the SIM card. And I'd be welcome to come back tomorrow for any setup assistance I need. I thanked the person and apologized for not getting the phone from him (he understood), and headed to the T-Mobile store.

T-Mobile's phone service has been mostly very good for us, but customer service is not their strong suit and it's been getting worse recently. (Their new CEO probably wants to close all their stores, forcing people to do everything through their crappy and oft-broken app.) I went to their store and the person said no problem, they can sell me an iPhone and move my service to it, I'll just need to use their app to... Ahem. Oh right, he said, ok we can sell you the phone, but we can't take a credit card; you'll need to pay cash. Oh really? I pointed out that the amount is over the daily limit at local ATMs, and he said I could pay a smaller amount and they'll finance it. Dubiouser and dubiouser. Somewhere in there he mentioned an "upgrade charge", I asked in what way I was upgrading my service, and he admitted that it was a service charge because they can't mark up the phone. Uh huh. At the start of the conversation, after checking my ID, he thanked me for being a customer for more than a decade, but I guess being a long-time customer doesn't actually mean anything.

I said no thanks and left. When I got home Dani said he got a text message from T-Mobile that someone on the account was making service changes, which I very much did not, so now we'll have to make sure they didn't actually do anything.

Tomorrow morning I'll go back to the Apple store with a bag of electronics -- my tablet for the authenticator app, my previous phone and its charger in case we need to move a SIM card to get a 2FA code anyway (I was able to use the phone tonight if it's plugged in), and the inherited iPad just in case that's helpful for anything because why not? I just wish I knew the name of today's helpful person so I could ask for him again. (He never said and I hadn't asked. Oops.)

Gremlins. Why did it have to be gremlins?

cellio: (Default)

If you are in the US, don't have employer-provided health insurance (hello layoffs, among others), and are thus buying your insurance on healthcare.gov or the state marketplaces, you might want to read [personal profile] siderea's series of posts on the subject soon: introduction, A health plan is a contract, and HSAs and bronze/catastrophic plans (so far). Technically you have until January 15 to sign up for 2026 insurance, but if you want insurance coverage in January, your deadline is Real Soon Now -- December 15 in most places, but earlier in some states. (I'm in PA where it's December 15; I haven't been tracking other places but Siderea mentions some in the introduction.)

Something I had missed is that for 2026, the government has admitted that bronze plans (with the lowest-but-still-high premiums) are inadequate, and you can now set up a Health Savings Account (HSA) with those plans. It's extra paperwork but can lead to savings on the money you were going to have to spend out of pocket anyway.

cellio: (Default)

I tried a new-to-me CSA this year, Who Cooks For You Farm. The summer share (which we got biweekly) was great, so I signed up for fall (weekly) which started this week. Their produce is very good, the prices are fair, and the people are very helpful and friendly. When we suddenly needed to leave town the day before a pickup (out-of-town funeral), they changed it for me. They don't do a winter share, alas, but maybe someday? Anyway, if you're in Pittsburgh and looking for a CSA, I recommend this one.

Related to this, any suggestions for ways to use watermelon radish other than raw in salads and roasted? It turns out that if you pickle it, while it tastes fine, the colors run and it no longer looks like little slices of watermelon.

In principle, the Internet is built on open, decentralized protocols. But in reality, an awful lot of the modern Internet depends on some key chokepoints. I found Cloudflare's post-mortem of Tuesday's outage fascinating and very well-done; most companies either don't publish reports like these or skimp on the details, but this one explains what happened and how red herrings made recovery harder. (Their service and the off-site status page went down at the same time; it was reasonable to suspect a coordinated attack, though it turned out to be a coincidence.) I feel for the team.

Today we got a notification from our local water utility about replacing lead pipes. They need our permission to replace the pipe connecting the main to our house, because part of it is on our property. They'll fix the sidewalk, but if they damage anything else, that's on us. Technically we can say no -- but if we do, they shut off our water. Um, great. We actually tested our water several years ago and the lead levels are well within acceptable parameters; left alone, we wouldn't do anything. But they're forcing the issue and I'm not sure why. (If there were bad test results, that would be different.) So, somebody will come by the week after next to look at our meter and plumbing and tell us what's going to happen. Joy.

I am now studying talmud, weekly and separately, with two different rabbis, neither of them my new rabbi. Earlier this year I also got connected to a Chabad Rosh Chodesh group (women only), which has been very nice. I love how interconnected the local community is. :-)

My new congregation continues to be a great fit.

I backed the Kickstarter for Kavango, a board game that we play a lot. The Kickstarter for an expansion is ending soon; I'm usually not a fan of game expansions, but this one looks solid, enhancing the game without making it more complicated or adding to the play length, so I backed it. (You can get the original game as a backer, too.)

We've been playing a lot of other games too. Terraforming Mars continues to be a favorite, including with one expansion (Preludes). Other expansions we've seen are not so appealing, though I'm interested in the alternate maps (other side of the planet).

A recently-published master's thesis on Stack Exchange's alienation of their core community and community responses was fascinating reading. I might have more to say about that later.

I am appalled by some of the shenanigans coming from the federal government of late, and that is about all I have the energy to say about it for now.

cellio: (Default)

At the shabbaton I led a text-study session that I called "Avram before Lech L'cha" (which was the week's portion). It was designed to be interactive, so this is a summary of how it went. Don't expect answers here, just interesting observations.

I started by saying that in the first three torah portions, God singles someone out for assigned tasks. The first is Adam, and there were no other options yet. The second is Noach, who was "righteous in his generation", a qualified statement. (Best of a bad lot?) Then comes Avram, and it just says God commanded him but the text doesn't tell us why.

We had a discussion about possible reasons, and then we looked at the first source. Almost all of what I brought is from Bereishit Rabbah (roughly contemporary with the g'mara, c 300-500 CE). All translations are from Sefaria: Read more... )

cellio: (Default)

My now-former synagogue has an occasional shabbaton (Shabbat retreat), nominally once a year but sometimes the gaps are longer. They had one this past Shabbat; I've attended every one since I joined the congregation and if this isn't the last one, it will be the last one as "us" before a merger/acquisition, so I wanted to be there even though I've otherwise moved on to my new synagogue.

This one didn't have the usual longer lead time; a date became available and they jumped on it. We were missing several of the regulars and some newer minyan members weren't able to come, so it was small -- which could have made it more intimate, but it didn't have quite the right mix for that. There was a single member from the other synagogue, plus their interim rabbi, and I wonder how it felt for that congregant.

I couldn't help noticing that the average age has skewed way up (most are rather older than me), especially if you exclude the clergy (who have to be there).

Because it was Halloween, their interim rabbi led a text study on spooky stories from the talmud, which was pretty engaging. From what I've seen, text study is his strong suit, so I'm glad he did that. The senior rabbi prefers discussions to more formal study and did that. The cantor taught about a rare and distinctive trope (cantillation mark) that appears in next week's parsha, one of only four times in the torah. I hadn't previously noticed that, every time shalshelet appears, it's on the first word of the verse. His source sheet is public.

I got email on Monday asking if I would lead a text study on Shabbat afternoon. I called it "Avram before Lech L'cha" and drew a lot from Bereishit Rabbah, which I hope to write about separately. The afternoon sessions are always more lightly attended (some people take walks or nap or shmooze), but we had enough people to have good conversations and I overheard some comments that suggest I have fans. I think it went pretty well. My biggest fear in leading a study session (as opposed to giving a d'var torah) is always what to do if people don't engage. Fortunately, people did. Someday maybe I will get better at facilitating rather than wholly directing conversations like this.

Overall: I'm glad I went, but I felt less inspired and connected than in the past. Maybe that's the mix, maybe it's that our long-time now-retired rabbi set a really high bar, maybe it's the merger, maybe it's me. I don't feel the need to go to whatever follows this in future years, even if many of my friends are still going.

I came home from the shabbaton last night, and this morning went to a very nice welcome session and brunch for new members at my new synagogue. One era ends, another begins. (And Beth Shalom does a great job with welcoming newcomers!)

Yom Kippur

Oct. 3rd, 2025 04:07 pm
cellio: (Default)

Yes. More like this, please.

Today is busy, building the sukkah and preparing for Shabbat, so brief notes will have to suffice for now.

I had no length expectations for Kol Nidrei. Ran about 2.5 hours, including a speech from the synagogue president which is pretty common. Before the service started, someone from the congregation played the Kol Nidrei melody on a violin; I recognized the styling and ornaments from the much longer version Temple Sinai does on cello and piano. Shorter and before the service was nice. I assume there is a "thing" about people expecting to hear the Kol Nidrei melody on bowed strings, but I don't know more than that. I thought it was just a Reform thing (Sinai and Rodef both do it during the service).

The essays in this year's seasonal book from Hadar were helpful, and fit nicely in that block of time between getting home and going to sleep.

Being able to spend the entire day in synagogue makes a big difference to me. I'm glad my new synagogue doesn't have a long stretch of down-time mid-afternoon like some do. We had classes and discussions -- optional and small, as most people left, but we didn't have to. Nice.

Morning service was somewhere around 5 hours (I didn't notice exactly), not including Avodah and Eleh Ezkarah which followed after a short break (5 minutes? 10?). For Avodah the rabbi interjected a lot of teaching, and he really encouraged people to try the prostration which was done by the people (not just the kohanim) when this was an actual service in the temple. He taught us how to do it and was very encouraging, so I tried it and am glad I did.

After, I was chatting with someone else who had tried it for the first time, and said that I came from a Reform background and had not expected to connect with the Avodah service until that year during lockdown when my synagogue was closed and I went to an Orthodox synagogue. "But," I said, "there was a song I'd heard a week before that also helped set the stage" and she immediately said "Yishai Ribo". Yes. So we chatted about that for a bit while waiting for classes to start.

For the afternoon haftarah reading (the book of Jonah) they had about a dozen teenagers chanting it, taking it in turns. It's great to see that many teens who are interested.

Hineni is in exactly the spot where it makes sense. (Contrast with my Reform experiences.)

Most of the service leaders were lay people who were very good -- strong voices and able to lead singing, mindful of what they were saying, evoked kavanah. Afterwards someone who knows I'm a new member asked me what I thought about having lay leaders instead of the rabbis (this also happens on Shabbat) and I said this is a positive thing and while our rabbis are great (I've seen both of them lead; they are), it's important to empower other qualified leaders too. Most of the Reform world seems to not agree with that perspective, which might be why the person asked.

By the time we got to the Amidah in Mincha I was ready to be done with the many-times-repeated Vidui sections. I didn't want to not be thinking about wrongs; rather, I wanted to be thinking about different wrongs after going through these ones so many times already. We human beings are very creative, alas, and since some things on the standard list do not resonate for me, it feels like I could be spending that time reflecting on things that do and that aren't on the list. (I ended up just focusing on the ones that seemed more directly to be areas for improvement.) For next year, perhaps I'll look for alternate lists to being with me for when the standard list is no longer sparking the thoughts it was designed to.

This is a placeholder for something I meant to talk about in my Rosh Hashana post too: differences between the individual and public Amidah, public is not just for listening but also has congregational singing parts, and I think Reform threw the baby out with the bath water, realized the tub was empty, and filled it up with other stuff instead of getting some of this goodness back. I will try to come back to this soon.

cellio: (Default)

I joined Beth Shalom in August. I'm still time-sharing Shabbat between there and my minyan, though that's winding down. (Sorry, minyan, I love my friends, but I'm settling into my new religious home.) Beth Shalom's Shabbat services are very comfortable and I'm seeing what I've been missing in the Reform movement. So I looked forward to Rosh Hashana this year.

It was great! Also, uh, long, but still a big win. I noticed that a lot of people drifted in over the course of the morning; there were not many people at the beginning and I could get a good seat, it was filling up by the torah service, and filled up more on the way to the sermon and then Musaf. On Rosh Hashana all the "big action" is in Musaf.

In addition to the Unataneh Tokef prayer, Musaf contains the themes of malchuyot (kingship), zichronot (memory), and shofarot (the shofar's call). For each of these three, the machzor (prayerbook) includes relevant passages from torah and prophets, piyutim (liturgical poems), and the sounding of the shofar. I've presumably heard some of those piyutim before, as I did go to Chabad for Rosh Hashana during the pandemic lockdown, but some of them stood out as if new to me this year. One in particular, Melech Elyon (king on high), stood out with some choreography -- this is sung in front of the open ark, except for one verse that talks, in contrast, about earthly kings, where we close the ark (and then open it again for the next verse). Neat, I thought -- as if to say, we will not trouble the king on high with stuff about mere human kings. And maybe that verse also stood out this year because of what is going on with our would-be earthly king, but I'll have to get a copy of the text before I can say more about that. (I do plan to buy both the siddur and machzor used by my new congregation, but haven't yet.)

The Reform services I have attended do basically none of this. The core part of Unataneh Tokef is sung, some other parts are read in English, and I think some of those biblical passages are included in the machzor. I never knew why they were there, and we usually didn't read them. And of course the shofar was sounded, along with the song after each set of blasts, but again, I didn't really grok the structure. And it wasn't in the Musaf service because Reform doesn't do Musaf; it was spread around in other places. I always thought my lack of connection with Temple Sinai's Rosh Hashana service came from an abundance of fluffy alternative English readings where liturgy should be -- and yes, that too, but not only that, I don't think. This year I felt like there was an integrated whole and that I was coming home to something I hadn't realized I was missing.

I knew that Rosh Hashana morning is the longest service of the year, but was still a little surprised by this one. (I expected four hours; it was more like four and a half.) Nonetheless, I appreciate that when we got to the silent repetition of the Musaf Amidah, they allowed us time to really do it. At other times I can't do the silent Amidah (any of them) in the time they leave for it; I'm just not that fast. But for this, we had space. That made a big difference to me.

During the public repetition (which is what takes up most of the time in Rosh Hashana Musaf), there were places where the congregation sang along, so it wasn't just "stand and listen to the leader". And some of those piyutim had lively, uplifting melodies.

I'm looking forward to Yom Kippur. (And Shabbat before then.)

cellio: (Default)

The other day, I saw something cute and reposted it on Mastodon:

Overheard, and for Internet old-timers: "Today is the 11,691st day of September 1993".

Someone responded to tell me that Debian has the sdate command "which keeps track for all of us".

I laughed. And then I found that there are also online calculators, for people who don't use Debian.

I am amused, even if -- or perhaps because -- those of us who remember the September that never ended are now a very small minority of the online population. Back then people were frustrated; today it's quirky history. Whatever your online community is -- Usenet, mailing lists, Twitter, Reddit, Dreamwidth, Stack Overflow, whatever -- it's going to change just from the people using it, let alone technology and companies. Don't get too comfortable.

cellio: (Default)

I've had my Visa card for a very long time (decades). I've been happy with the provider, and the few times I needed the weight of Visa behind a dispute, they came through. No fuss, just like I want a credit card to be.

A few months ago they started sending me email to invite me to add another authorized user to my card, suggesting it as a safety net (so if something happens to me, someone else can administer my account). Maybe that appeals to someone, but I'm not interested so I ignored it. More recently they have been offering minor inducements (a one-time small credit) to do this, and that makes me wonder what their real goal is.

If this is merely a service they offer for peace of mind, the peace of mind is the inducement and nothing else is needed. That they are trying to entice people to do it means there's some other motivation that benefits them more directly. I'm assuming this is not a way to add your minor children so they can more easily make in-app purchases or whatever the kids are doing these days -- and anyway, unless they're giving you a way to throttle spending from other users, that would be a very bad idea.

The only thing I can come up with is that this is a way for people with bad credit scores to get access to credit cards. They aren't going to issue cards to such folks directly, but if they can get you to add your deadbeat cousin with a terrible credit rating (to "help" your family member), then the credit-card company gets more transactions and thus more transaction fees at very low risk to them. They know an existing customer who'd like to keep a good credit rating is on the hook for the charges; they're going to get paid. This might be in Visa's interest, but how is it in mine? It's not, which is presumably why they're trying to buy folks off.

Have I missed some benign reason for them to push this scheme?

(Still not doing it, but curious.)

cellio: (Default)

This year I got three (different) tomato seedlings, all container-friendly, along with some peppers and other things. Having failed to do proper research, I allocated the tomato cages pretty arbitrarily. I should not have done that.

potted plants on a patio with a gigantic tomato plant in the middle

The giant tomato plant in the center is a Sungold. It seems to be in the process of conquering my patio, the neighborhood, and perhaps the city. It makes sweet, tasty, orange cherry tomatoes. I've had quite a bounty so far and there's plenty more to come. It was originally on that ledge with the others, but a month or so ago I realized that if I kept it there, I would not be able to harvest without a ladder. (So much for using that trellis.) At least this way I can climb up on that ledge to reach the ones I can't reach from the ground (or at least I hope I'll be able to reach them all!). Wowza. Next year, bigger cage! (They're very tasty, so I do plan to get this type next year.)

The other two tomato types are Patio Choice, advertised as good for small containers, and Mountain Magic. They both produce red grape tomatoes (Patio Choice are sweeter). On the right, not as clear in the picture, are two Cornito peppers and a banana pepper, all still working toward a first harvest. I've moved these around a few times over the course of the summer to try to optimize sunlight.

cellio: (Default)

Dani and I both concluded, at about the same time, that our office chairs were past their use-by dates. We both also want to test a chair, not just order blind, so we headed off to a well-stocked office-supply store and found replacements. (As it turned out, we both liked the same model.)

While we were there I asked if they had any kneeling chairs, because I'd like to try varying my posture. I had one of those 30+ years ago that I liked (at work), but also encountered several I didn't like, so I definitely want to try first. (Also, I don't know if it's compatible with the arthritis that is starting to form in one knee.) Alas, the sales rep said, that business has moved entirely online, so I gave up on that.

I had a height-adjustable (sit or stand) desk at my last job, back before Covid. Replacing my current desk would be a pain (as well as expensive), but after we got the chairs I started looking at "adapters", an adjustable thing you can put on your desk to raise a platform rather than the whole desk. Many of them make strong (maybe even binding) assumptions about monitor placement that do not work with my vision, but eventually I found a "just raise this (basically) rectangle and don't do anything else" model with metal, not plastic, core parts.

Raised platform holding a monitor, keyboard, and mouse, with space behind; the L-shaped desk below has two visible computers, a headset, a coffee mug, a water bottle, part of a printer, and assorted peripherals and papers. The monitor shows a MacOS lock screen.  A two-part footrest is visible below the desk.

With nothing on it the platform lifts easily (there's a control on one side). With a monitor that is well below the rated weight limit, the first few inches of lifting are a fair bit of work, and then it goes fine. Lowering is easy. I switch back and forth once or twice a day, so that initial push is ok; if I were working full-time and wanting to change it up every hour or so, it might be more annoying.

I thought of half of a second-order effect. With this setup, even with the desk lowered the platform is about three inches higher than the desk surface. That's ok, I said; I'll just raise the chair. I rejected similar products that added more "resting" height; I did think about this. The part I didn't think about is that I'm short, so that change to chair height makes the difference between my feet reaching the floor and not. So now I am experimenting with footrests, courtesy of a friend, one of which is visible in the photo. I think this is the style I want, particularly if I can get a wedge of foam to stick in there to hold the "V" shape.

It all goes to show that you can't change just one thing. So far, though, I think this is working out.

cellio: (Default)

My mother has never learned to use computers, aside from a smartphone that she uses for calls and texting with the grandkids. After my father died and she asked me to do something with my father's several desktop and laptop computers, she cancelled their Internet service that she wouldn't be using. But she held onto my dad's newest tablet, thinking she could use it to browse news and look at photos. This requires a network connection, so I set up her phone for tethering, set up the tablet to automatically connect to that network, and showed her how to turn that on and off on her phone. (I described this as "turning on Internet for the tablet".)

In the end she found this too difficult and she's never used that tablet, so this week she gave it to me. It's an iPad Pro (3rd generation, 12.9") and comes to me with a keyboard cover and a couple of Apple pencils. I'd already downloaded his Apple cloud backups more than a year ago, so I could safely reset the tablet. I'm new to iOS (I use Android), so I figure this is a chance to check it out before the next time I need to replace a phone or tablet. I'm happy to accept pointers, app recommendations, and warnings. I do have a Mac desktop, but their mobile setup is new to me.

Apple aims for intuitive user interfaces, but that doesn't mean they always succeed. When deleting personal information as part of resetting, I had to enter first the PIN and then my father's Apple password. That makes sense. After I entered the password I hit return, but there was no visible change. I hit return again, thinking it hadn't taken, then tried delete to see if that changed anything, and concluded that it was stuck. I let it sit there for a while. Five minutes later, I got a "no connection" popup. Ok, yeah, now that you mention it I should have realized I'd need to connect it to my WiFi for that to work, but if it had given me any indication of what it was doing ("connecting...") while it was doing it, I would have known (a) that it was doing something and (b) that I needed to fix that. Instead, the interface just gave me a mystery for a while. Oops.

Those two Apple pencils are an as-yet-unsolved puzzle. My mother gave me one that was with the tablet (there's a magnetic connection) and one in a box that she thought was new (my father ordered it but never got a chance to use it, she thinks). The two pencils look identical to me, except that the one in the box is missing the plastic cap that should be on its stylus. The plastic cap from the other one does not fit it -- so they seem to be different, but that's my only clue. The box says "2nd generation". Something I found online describes the first generation as round and the second as mostly round with a flat side (because it was too easy for the first generation to roll off of desks). Both of these have that flat side, so I conclude that my father replaced one second-generation pencil with another, but if so, I am left wondering why the cap from one doesn't fit the other. I have no idea which of these is actually newer; maybe he did replace it (maybe he broke his first one?) and he put the old one in the box the new one came in? So many mysteries.

The tablet is now busy updating from iOS 17.1 to 18.5. Yeah, it's been offline a while.

neat sky!

Jul. 8th, 2025 08:10 pm
cellio: (Default)

Last night I looked out the window a few minutes after nominal sunset and saw an unusual and impressive color in the sky. Naturally, I ran outside to snap a few pictures before it disappeared.

These are unedited cell-phone photos, hastily framed because I know things like this don't last long. Read more... )

cellio: (Default)

We went to Origins Game Fair last week. My previous post covered the games we played; this post is about everything else.

The convention was, overall, pleasant -- not as crowded as I expected for the 50th year, at least in the parts we frequented, but we had critical mass for all the games we played and it was nice to not have to push through crowds like at GenCon.

We had one excellent teacher, several good ones, and a couple terrible ones. In one game it became clear two hours in that we were missing an important rule, and another was very disorganized. There is a wide range from "enthusiastic fan who wants to evangelize the game" at one end to "I'm hoping to book enough game-running slots to get free admission" at the other, and I don't know if there is any sort of feedback to the convention. I didn't see a way to let them know that that person running Terraforming Mars was outstanding and should be invited back, for instance. And maybe that's not even the right model; I have no idea how Origins makes decisions about who can run games, or if they even do. They collect the tickets at games, so they know both how many people registered for a game and how many actually showed up, but I don't know if that affects future years for that game, that game-runner, or nothing.

I was satisfied with most of the games we played; we expected both positive and negative reactions, so a game I don't like very much (or feel neutral about) is still useful data. We can try many more games than we can ultimately bring back to our gaming groups, after all, so eliminating candidates is important too. That said, we identified half a dozen games that we liked enough to want to get (though one of them is way too expensive so we won't unless that changes), so I consider that to be very successful.

We did not do a good job of pacing this year, exacerbated by getting locked out of most of our choices for the middle day, when our first-draft schedule had some breaks built in. We ended up with a lot of long, solid blocks and didn't factor in the cognitive load of learning all those games. We can invite friends over and play games we already know for ten hours and be quite happy, but that doesn't mean ten straight hours of new convention games with strangers are a good idea. I need to remember this for next year. Also, we should front-load more and give ourselves more breaks on Friday and especially Saturday. There is a temptation to book Saturday solid because it's Shabbat so it's not like we're going out for lunch or having dinner much before 10PM, but it's a mistake.

In two or three games this year, the game-runners used an app to choose the starting player (everyone touch this phone). For the game that was on Shabbat I declined and was ready to accept going last, but the person just shrugged and randomized a different way, which was nice. I've see people use that app (or an app, anyway) before, and it always makes me wonder: did this problem need an app? We have been randomly choosing a meeple or rolling dice for this for decades and I've never felt that to be lacking. Only later did the info-security aspect occur to me: I should also maybe not be eager to hand over a fingerprint impression to someone who knows my name (from the event ticket), just on general principle.

We went to two seminars (though both on the same day, so they didn't help as much with pacing as they could have). One was pretty good; in the other one, halfway through I asked Dani if he was enjoying it, he said "no me neither", and we left as discreetly as we could. Three other people followed us out, almost like they were waiting for someone to start. The presenter probably had interesting things to say but did not seem to have prepared the talk. We've had that experience before with this particular fan group (some groups run "tracks" of activities), so I'll pay more attention to that in future years. Origins also has a films room, a few comedy or music performances, and a little bit in the way of crafts, so we should look at those too. I don't think I can lure Dani into the figure-painting area, but I used to enjoy that and it could be a way to break up a non-Shabbat day.

Most of the games are run in one of the big halls in the convention center. I think there's a cumulative draining effect from the harsh fluorescent lights and the background noise of all those other games, and that's another thing to take into account when we try to build a schedule -- if that information is available in April when we choose events, which I don't remember.

Some game-runners were good about accommodating my vision needs, but a few brushed me off and in one game, both the game-runner and two of the other players were kind of rude about it. When I asked for help during the game because I couldn't see and couldn't memorize everything ("which tile is that (points)?" etc), I picked up some sighs and the vague sense that the reaction might have been different if I were not the only woman at the table. I can't point to anything specific and I'm not someone who jumps to conclusions about sexism, but this kinda felt like it. I was often the only woman at the table in the games I played and most of the time I didn't pick up this vibe, so I think it was just that one group of people.

We did one quick run through the dealers' room. We only saw one "general" games vendor, as opposed to publishers selling their own games. We also walked past a lot of banners, plushies, dice, jewelry, miniatures, and LARP gear. Several publishers had raffles for unspecified games or expansions/components, winner must be present at such-and-such time on Sunday. That's easy for the vendor but hard for participants, so even though we got handed free tickets at some games we played, we didn't bother with any of them.

The first year we went to Origins we got a hotel that was about a mile away, so we walked to the convention in the morning and stayed all day. There aren't a lot of good places in the convention center to sit and take a break for an hour, though, so after that, we started paying for closer hotels. This year we were right across the street from the convention center, and being able to go back to the room for an hour between sessions turns out to be a really huge win. Also, our hotel had coffee available all day in the lobby, so that was a nice bonus. We never had to stand in the long lines at the coffee places in the convention center (or pay $5 or more for a cup of coffee).

The multi-day heat wave started during the convention. This made the drive home a little challenging. Under normal circumstances we wouldn't have made that extra stop to get something cold to drink and sit in Panera's air conditioning, but it sure helped this time! Originally we had planned to leave Columbus after the hottest part of the day, but a no-show game-runner messed with our plans and we left earlier.

cellio: (Default)

We got home from Origins Game Fair today. As usual, we focused on games we don't already know, which means we expect some winners and some losers. This year, most of our pre-convention information about these games came from Board Game Geek (and, in one case, a fan among my readers). We also attended a couple non-games.

Origins has a ton of games, and you really want to preregister for them instead of taking your chances at the con. Dani winnowed the huge list down to a smaller number of candidates, and then we sorted those into four buckets: A (really want to play), B (looks good), C (would play), and X (nope!). I'm going to list the bucket we put each game into, so I can start tracking prediction versus reality. We had to do a second round of scheduling after we got locked out of some of our initial picks, so not all games have buckets.

Theoretically most games at Origins are taught. Some require experience (we didn't sign up for any of those). Some games were additionally listed as "learn to play", suggesting more active teaching and guidance. Some, but not all, of those are run by the publishers. We had one outstanding learn-to-play non-publisher experience.

Wednesday

  • Keep the Heroes Out!: Cooperative game where the players are dungeon monsters trying to keep the invaders (heroes, adventurers) from getting their hard-earned treasure. Each monster has different abilities. It sounded like a fun concept and some of the mechanics were interesting, but a lot depends on random chance and it was hard to strategize. It's icon-heavy; there was a player cheat sheet (good), but it was not entirely accurate (bad). Thumbs down. (Bucket: A.)

  • Pandemic: The Cure (it looks like we were playing with the Experimental Meds expansion): This is an abstraction of Pandemic, using six zones instead of a world map and role-specific dice to constrain your actions. On your turn you roll your dice, which tell you which actions (including role-specific ones) are available to you this turn. You can re-roll, but if the biohazard face comes up that moves the group along the infection track (and you can't re-roll that die). Diseases are asymmetric dice, with the number telling you which zone it affects. Curing diseases involves players collecting dice of the same color, replacing the cards in the original game. It's a quick game and we enjoyed it. We want to get it. (Bucket: C.)

Thursday

  • Metro: The board made me think of Tsuro when I saw it. Players are trying to build train tracks connecting starting positions with a station. The edge of the board alternates starting positions and stations and there's a station in the center of the board. You're trying to make your tracks as long as possible and there's a bonus for connecting to the center station. On your turn you place a tile into the 8x8 grid; each tile has two track connections on each edge, and it's designed so that there's always a valid placement. It's a quick game; our teaching game was about 40 minutes. We both liked this a lot and want to get it. (Second-round pick.)

  • Weather Meeple: A lightweight game about manipulating the weather. You're trying to use your weather cards (which can produce sun, rain, lightning, clouds, or snow) to "build" the weather systems for four "goal" forecasts. It's sort of an engine-building game (your cards and what they produce), with new card draws affecting which of your cards can produce this round, which you can mitigate with an action... cute, ok. I'd play again if a friend brought it over and wanted to, but otherwise, meh. (Second-round pick.)

  • Dwellings of Eldervale: No. Just...no. Ok, I understand why it appeals to some; it's sort of worker-placement, sort of area-control, definitely monster-fighting, cards you can buy to gain abilities, sixteen different "factions" to choose from each with its own special abilities, variable dynamic board with special spaces... I should have taken stronger note of the game-runner asking us, at the beginning, to just go with it and if we aren't having fun don't let it show. The game has a lot of stuff, so you need a large table, and the con's options for that are bad, and the game components were already visually challenging even before that... Thumbs down. (Bucket: A.)

  • High Frontier: Dani really likes the idea of Phil Eklund's games, which tend to be about biology and evolution and get very, very detailed. I noted the BGG complexity rating of 4.35 (out of 5) and suggested that maybe we split up for that session. He reported that the game has a lot of potential and he'd like to figure it out, but if he's going to burn social capital on getting a group together to figure out a long complex game, it's not going to be this one.

  • Learn to play: Nassau: Rum & Pirates is a good game. It didn't need a second level, adding a seafaring phase after each city phase. 'Nuff said. (Bucket: A.)

  • Foundations of Rome: Loved this. Players are building three types of buildings (residential, commercial, civic) on a shared grid. You each have a supply of buildings of different sizes and shapes. In order to build, you first have to acquire deeds to the land you'll need. Deeds come out for purchase in random order, so while your goal might be that big bank that requires four spaces in a square, you might have to start with a couple one-space houses or bakeries or whatever and then replace them as you get the land you need. (You can always replace to grow, but you can't subdivide.) Most buildings score based on what they're adjacent to, so there's a lot of player interaction. Our game took about an hour.

    The game is physically beautiful. You get a tray of three-dimensional, decorated little buildings, with clear indications on their tops about how they score. Based on the images at Board Game Geek, there's a whole fandom around painting those miniatures. The game is very expensive (over $300). I don't think it would be nearly as satisfying to play without the nice components, but we're not shelling out for that, either. This game might be one we look for at conventions. (Bucket: A.)

Friday

We got almost none of our first-round picks for Friday, so we ended up assembling this from still-available parts.

  • Learn to play: Liftoff 2.0, run by the designer: Competitive space-program development starting in the 1950s. Players develop technologies (like orbital satellites, first-stage rockets, and capsules) and do research to improve their safety. You schedule future launches and do your best to develop what you'll need to a level of safety you're willing to go with, and then you roll the dice for each stage of the launch to see how you did. You gain prestige points from successful launches and from being the first to do things like put a man in orbit. Prestige begets better funding. Failures and random events can set you back, and you might decide to scrub a scheduled launch if your research didn't pan out enough (or you ran out of money to fund it). This is a remake of an older game I've never played. I'm interested in seeing the finished game (we played with a prototype and I gave some feedback on some vision issues).

  • Town Builder: Coevorden: Tableau-building card game. Each card can be used as either a specific (proto-)building or a specific resource. To build a building, you buy its card and then accumulate the resources that will be needed to construct it. When you have all the resources, your building is built and you can use any special abilities it gives you. Buildings are worth victory points (harder buildings are worth more), and there are also some random goals like "have three civic buildings". It's a fairly quick game, maybe 45 minutes (box says 30-60). We chose it in part because of the publisher, First Fish -- we like another of their games. We bought this at the convention.

  • Corps of Discovery: Lewis and Clark and Monsters. This is a cooperative deduction game with periodic specific goals. Players are exploring a map, turning over tiles to reveal things like water, food, forts, and threats. You are told some "rules" for placement like "water and food will always be adjacent", which lets the group reason about the not-yet-revealed spots. You need to collect certain resources at certain times, have food and water and a campfire at the end of the day, and gather things to improvise weapons for when the monsters find you. We both liked it a lot and want to get it. I do hope there's enough map variability, given that there are those constraints, to keep it interesting. (I mean, I used to accidentally memorize the eye chart at my vision exams before they introduced more variability. I didn't want to...) (Bucket: A.)

  • We also attended two seminars, one on 19th-century science fiction and one allegedly on military logistics in ancient and medieval times.

Saturday

  • Kingsburg: Each player has a province that you're trying to improve. The game plays through five years of four seasons; spring, summer, and fall are for production and building, and in the winter the monsters come out. By winter you need to have enough strength from the buildings you built or the mercenaries you hired. On your (non-winter) turn you roll three dice and can spend them to claim positions from 1 through 18 -- standard worker-placement rules, first come first served. You could use just one of your dice to get that wood on 4 that you really need, or you can combine them to get higher-value items. You need an exact match, so depending on how you rolled, you might not get what you were trying for. You can see what other players rolled, so you can reason about what they might take from you or what you can safely leave for later. We both liked this. (Bucket: B.)

  • Learn to play: Canals of Windcrest: Sequel to Mistwind, which we like. Despite it being marked "learn to play", there was a large, fast info dump at the beginning and it looked like there wouldn't be a lot more, and there are a lot of moving parts, and I was not feeling good about it, so (after confirming it wouldn't mess up the table) I bailed. Dani played and reported that it's a good game but, yes, lots of moving parts that he only started to understand after playing. (Bucket: A.)

  • Unpub: There is an area set aside for game designers to test-drive works in progress. For players, you can just show up, look around for something that looks interesting and has the "needs players" flag up, and go join. While Dani was playing Canals I wandered in there and joined a game called Toll the Dead. (This turned out to be thematically coincidental; see next entry.) This is a cooperative game with limited communication (made me think of Crew in that regard). The dead and also the destroyer are working their way up through the nine circles of hell trying to escape; the players have to stop them. Your tools: bellringers who do damage to enemies in the same space (maybe more) and then move, and variable special abilities. You roll dice and then allocate them semi-secretly; everyone can see if you're bringing in a new ringer and where, but most other actions are secret. (There's more to it, but I don't want to do anything that might impede the designer. For example, Origins has a no-photography rule in this room.) I enjoyed the game a lot and after we played the designer asked for feedback (general and some specific questions) and we had a good conversation. She's hoping to pitch it to a publisher, not Kickstart it, so there's no URL to follow right now but I did get a card so I can check back later.

  • Inferno: A "soul management" game, the publisher says. Each turn has two places, below and above. Below, you are trying to guide souls to the correct circles of Hell, gaining infamy (victory) points when you deliver them. Above, you are placing workers in various buildings in Florence to get corresponding game effects. What you did in Hell restricts what you can do in Florence. Hell gets restocked when players use the Florence action to accuse someone of sin, which gets you benefits in Hell. There are scoring tracks (one for each circle) and you only get to score a track at all if (a) you have one of your markers there and (b) you managed to place a different marker there, the means for which were a little unclear to me. It felt like a very complicated game; BGG says 3.57 but I would have put it at 4+. I don't mind that I played but I'm not looking for another game of it. (Bucket: A.)

  • Learn to play: Terraforming Mars: Ok, it's like this. I've been around games of Terraforming Mars. I've been around one struggling teaching session of Terraforming Mars that persuaded me to be elsewhere in a hurry. It looks super-complicated and super-fiddly. This session, though, was a delight. The person running it (just a regular gamer, not from the publisher) was excellent and enthusiastic. I now understand why some of my readers like this game.

    Players are each playing a corporation who are collectively trying to make Mars habitable. There are joint goals, like increasing the oxygen level and temperature, and you get victory points when you contribute to those goals. You also have other ways to get points. At its core everything depends on two things: what resources you have (and can generate), and what cards you choose to buy and later play. Card-management is probably pretty strategic once you know what you're doing; in this game I was playing more tactically, becuase how would I know if this card I can buy on turn 2 might be useful five turns from now when the temperature is high enough to allow me to play it? Stuff like that. Cards can give you resources, better resource generation, ways to earn points (I had "Pets", which collects points when people build cities), discounts on standard actions (like placing a forest tile), and lots more. Each round there's a card draft where you can choose cards to keep (for a fee). Playing them also costs money. Your corporation gives you some special advantages, which you should factor in, but sometimes the best cards just don't show up (or show up at the right time).

    Our session, with teaching and coaching and some discussion after, ran a little over three hours. With experience, it's probably a two-hour game, or maybe even shorter. (Bucket: B.)

Sunday

We were signed up for two two-hour games on Sunday (both in bucket A). The first one was a no-show, and we decided that the second one wasn't compelling enough to wait for and headed home instead. Playing games most of the day for several days is already pretty tiring (more for me than for Dani I think), and we didn't do a great job this time of padding the schedule with non-game (or non-game-in-the-room-with-the-enervating-fluorescent-lights) activities. One solution there -- at the cost of making the jigsaw puzzle more complicated -- might be splitting up here and there like we did this time. For example, I like RPGs more than Dani does, and I haven't played any at conventions.

cellio: (Default)

My synagogue is being acquired [1] and this was the final nudge to find an alternative. This past Shabbat they cancelled our services in favor of the other place, so I went to Beth Shalom, which I last visited during Pesach. Beth Shalom is a large congregation, which is a little challenging for this introvert, but I assume that if I go there regularly I'll gradually meet people and maybe even be able to learn their names.

Their service is uplifting and pretty efficient. They're Conservative, so they include a lot of things that my current (Reform) congregation doesn't do, but it didn't make the service that much longer. I will need to practice the Hebrew in some unfamiliar sections so that I can sing the songs with them; I was kind of singing this time, hitting maybe one word in four and faking the rest. (I know how to read Hebrew; I'm just slow.)

I had not noticed that they had designated this week as Pride Shabbat until the rabbi spoke. I mean yes, I saw some pins and rainbow talitot and stuff, but I saw those the last time I was at Beth Shalom too, so that's just ordinary support/visibility stuff. And there'd been some signs outside, but I hadn't noticed dates. In other words, they integrated the already-welcome queer community into the Shabbat service, honoring people without replacing the whole service with a bunch of creative readings. (Temple Sinai's Pride Shabbat feels more like a poetry slam; Shabbat barely makes an appearance.) I haven't been to a bar or bat mitzvah at Beth Shalom yet, but I imagine it's the same idea there: celebrate together in the context of Shabbat. Conservative and of course Orthodox synagogues tend to prioritize the community, and Shabbat itself, integrating celebrations into the whole instead of carving them off as separate things as Reform is wont to do. It's refreshing.

They have a kiddush lunch every week, which is presumably the best way to meet and get to know people. During Sukkot I went there and ended up in a lunch conversation with another Babylon 5 fan who was explaining the show to a third person. (I haven't seen the fan again yet, alas.) This week I couldn't stay because we had a friend coming, but there'll be a next time and probably soon.

There was a passing comment about the senior rabbi's upcoming sabbatical. I don't know more than that, and I'll want to have a chat with him before, or as part of, joining there, but it's not urgent. There is also an associate rabbi who I like so far; I plan to soon start going to a weekly class he teaches. While exploring their web site I discovered that both rabbis have blogs, which I'm now subscribed to.

Beth Shalom, not unusually, does not publish their dues expectations; you need to have a conversation with someone. Large old congregations with large old buildings tend to have high dues, which I might not be able to afford, especially if they don't have the concept of an individual membership. It can be worked out I'm sure, but it's a little awkward and embarrassing to have that conversation, and I wish I had some data going into it. Oh well; we'll get there. The high holy days (the one time a year when this really matters) are not for a few months yet.

Rodef Shalom (the synagogue Temple Sinai cancelled services for) puts their services on YouTube, so I skimmed that service yesterday. I knew they were having a guest musician, Dan Nichols, as part of celebrating their rabbi's retirement. I knew from a past Dan Nichols visit that he leans toward creative songs and less liturgy (more of a concert than a service), but I was still surprised by what I saw. How do you have a Shabbat morning service that goes almost two hours and not do Kri'at Sh'ma or the T'filah?! By caring I am a minority in the Reform movement, I know, and while this is extreme, it's also a hint of where Rodef Sinai is going. It's time to be elsewhere.

[1] This is not how the leaders characterize it, but I have seen some of the sausage-making and I stand by this description.

cellio: (Default)

About a year and a half ago, the president of my synagogue started a project to merge ours with another synagogue. We were supposed to be exploring other options for our future too, but the leaders were really only investigating this one path. Some of us members had concerns about both that path and how this was being done, but power imbalances are a thing, and yesterday there was a vote.

There've been plenty of irregularities, and also some maligning by leaders of dissenters, and at this point it feels like the damage has been done even if the deal ultimately falls through. I've lost faith in our leaders, am disappointed by the unnecessary discord and condescension, and am saddened by the drop in civility and goodwill affecting people I care about. It is possible for people to disagree constructively and work together to address those differences, but it doesn't feel like that happened here. To me this felt more like a conquest than democracy, but as a member of the minority I'm naturally biased.

Maybe this was the swift kick I've been needing for a while to join a movement more aligned with me. I joined Temple Sinai despite it being Reform, not because of it, but our leaders seem to be more interested in the future of Reform Judaism here than in the future of Temple Sinai. My long-time rabbi retired a few years ago, recent trends have been leftward, and I think I've stayed only for my friends (a pattern in my life, I know). I don't want to lose those friendships, but it's time to go make some new friends too.

cellio: (Default)

Last fall we booked a trip for this past week with a "surprise travel" agency -- you give them dates and a budget and fill out a "dating profile" for cities, and they plan something for you, tell you what time to show up at the airport (pre-dawn, in our case), and give you your boarding passes and other details on the morning of your departure. We've done this twice before, one plane trip and one road trip. We haven't flown since before Covid, but we've wanted to go somewhere farther than driving distance, and this definitely qualified. Once again, Pack Up & Go picked out an interesting destination that was not otherwise on our radar.

Our information packet informed us that Denver gets 300 days a year of sun, but we got two days of rain before clearing for our last day there. Ah well -- best-laid plans and all that! So we did not get to experience the beautiful scenic views of the Rockies, but there was plenty else to do. And we caught some glimpses on the last day when it cleared up.

Our hotel was downtown ("LoDo", i.e. lower downtown -- all the neighborhoods have abbreviations like that, we learned) and we could walk to lots of places. We stayed at the Maven at Dairy Block, where we had a very comfortable and kind of quirky suite. (I now regret not taking some pictures to share.) The people at the front desk were excellent -- helpful, friendly, English-fluent, and available at all hours.

--

Denver has at least two art museums. We went to the "regular" one (as opposed to the contemporary-art one) and found a huge, well-presented collection. Seven floors (we ran out of steam before we finished), decent introductions to the various rooms, and the placards were of a font size and placement that I could read them. Aside: I expected Saint George's dragon to be bigger:

statue of Saint George standing over a dragon about the size of a large dog

We also visited the Denver Museum of Nature and Science (I mean, do you know us? of course we did :-) ), which had a couple special exhibits in addition to their usual offerings. Both were very good. One was "Angkor: the Lost Empire of Cambodia" -- at some other museum in some other city we saw a movie about Angkor, but this was our first time seeing artifacts. This exhibit was free (with museum admission) and was well-done. It made me want to see that ancient temple in person, though I doubt travel to Cambodia is going to happen.

The other special exhibit was "Jurassic Oceans: Monsters of the Deep", and I'm really glad we paid for those tickets. On the one hand, I'm kind of at the stage where I've seen a lot of dinosaurs and what's one more? But on the other hand, this focused on ocean, not land, creatures, and they don't get so much attention. The exhibit was very well done in almost all respects, and had a mix of conventional displays (mostly fossils of course), short movie clips, interactive exhibits, and docents with individual displays where we could pick things up, ask questions, and talk with someone who's more of an expert than we are. The one area they could have improved was traffic flow: when we entered we didn't know if we were supposed to zig-zag or follow a left- (or right-) hand rule, and when it became clear that we needed to zig-zag (the exit was not by the entrance), the sequencing was sometimes not clear. We almost missed a couple side loops when we got a little lost in the flow.

The rest of the museum was mostly set up well. Some explanatory placards were behind glass next to whatever item was on display, and some of those were at a distance where I could not read them and (because of the glass) could not get closer. This was particularly true in the minerals hall. Many museums have this particular accessibility failure, but I was disappointed to see it here when the rest was so well-done.

Somewhere in the general exhibits I found this science advice:

rules of the game: 1 eat; 2 have lots of tiny babies (or a few really big ones); 3 don't get eaten

We took a city tour (van, not bus), which was interesting as far as it went but at two hours felt short. Too late to do anything about it, we learned about tours that go into the mountains and the Great Divide. If we were planning a trip to Denver we would have dedicated a day for that, but of course the whole point of surprise travel is that you don't know in advance so there was no chance to discuss that, and for a three-day trip I understand why they wouldn't dedicate a full day to that. We'll just have to go to the Rockies on our own at some point. :-)

When it was still raining but down to a drizzle we went to the Denver botanical gardens, which have both indoor (greenhouse) and outdoor parts. We enjoyed this and ran out of steam before we ran out of gardens. There was a small collection of bonsai, including this one that seems to defy gravity. I assume there isn't a heavy weight in the bottom of that bowl, anyway:

juniper bent way over to one side and extending several feet from its base

--

Pack Up & Go made dinner reservations for the two nights we were there, and both restaurants were excellent. Root Down is employee-owned, locally-sourced, and veggie-rich while also having dishes for meat-eaters. Everything we had was tasty and there were some unexpected combinations, like the carrot & red curry soup with apple-pear chutney. We each had soup and an entree and we shared a small plate, and we were too full for dessert. (To their credit, they have a very small dessert offering, an espresso truffle for $2, which we decided we could make room for. That is clever planning.) Service was excellent.

The other was Tamayo in Larimer Square, a high-end Mexican restaurant. Let me tell you, they had a vegetarian entree that was basically roasted cauliflower with interesting sauces, and it was wonderful! (It was the colored cauliflower, too -- my plate had green and purple along with white.) The salsas (three) that we had with chips were flavorful and ranged from mild to hot. The menu annotates every item with allergens, along with the usual vegetarian and vegan markers. Dani had some member of the steak family that used Mexican seasonings that he said was good.

Pack Up & Go asks about your interests, and one of the items you can check off is theatre. We did, and they booked us for a show -- which turned out to be one we saw within the last two years, but of course they couldn't know that and we wouldn't have thought to offer a list of what we've seen recently. We still enjoyed Book of Mormon -- I think I enjoyed it more than Dani did, but it was a very good performance (Broadway touring company) and it didn't feel as harshly crude to me this time as last time. It's at times vulgar and often sacrilegious, to be clear, but it's also very funny and there are good character-growth arcs there too. Our seats were far-enough back that I missed some of the sight gags that I know where there, but I still saw enough to enjoy it. Being me, I also started thinking about how, from a systems perspective, a surprise-travel agency could avert this sort of thing without spoiling the surprise, but those musings don't fit in the margins of this blog post.

--

Airport security at Pittsburgh took about half an hour. At Denver, which was also right after the Real-ID requirement kicked in, it was very fast -- I barely had time to get my ID out and my phone ready with the boarding pass before we were being asked for them. The agents at Denver were more brusque than the ones at Pittsburgh, almost yelling at people sometimes; I wonder if this is the difference between mid-afternoon and the pre-dawn hours.

We flew United and the planes were large enough to have middle seats. When two people are traveling together, that means one of them is going to be in a middle seat, never fun. These ones were ok, to my surprise. And there was a smidge more legroom than I expected. I avoid window seats because sometimes they can be very hard to get in and out of (particularly since I've started to have a little arthritis in one knee) and always try for aisle seats, but I didn't get an aisle either time and it was ok. (I should remember in the future to use the free-text field on the survey to indicate these airplane-seating preferences.)

We crossed two time zones, which gave us more time on the ground in Denver in exchange for getting home at midnight. This was fine with us; if you do something like this and a late return before work/school the next morning would be a problem, you should say so when you book.

cellio: (Default)

Someone shared this beautiful thought with me via email and I'm boosting it:

You have permission to be ordinary.
To live a quiet life.
To go for a walk without turning it into content.
To do good work without chasing viral.
To be present with your people instead of always “building something.”
Your life doesn’t have to be optimized to be meaningful.
The Ordinary creates space for what truly matters.

--David Keeler

storm

May. 1st, 2025 09:24 pm
cellio: (Default)

Well, that's the longest power outage we've had in a while, and we're among the lucky ones.

Tuesday was forecast for rain. Late afternoon we both got those loud phone alerts about a severe storm with high winds, incoming quickly. It was overcast at the time. Not long after, the sky suddenly got dark and we heard the wind whipping through, followed a minute later by hail. This lasted maybe as much as ten minutes, and then it stopped and the sky lightened up and we heard the patter of normal rain on our roof (which we had, ironically, just replaced last week).

About an hour later we had a couple power flickers and then lost power entirely. I'm not surprised when we lose power during a storm, but I'm not sure what it means when it comes later. We optimistically waited to power down the computers. (My UPS has a pretty good display to help judge that.) Eventually we powered them down, turned off lights that we thought were on and that might wake us up if power came back overnight, lit some candles, and settled in to read. I tried to report the outage (I assumed they already knew, but maybe the reports feed statistics that inform priorities?), but their web site wasn't loading and their phone wasn't answering. Cell service was at this point limping; a bit later we lost it entirely. (This would have been a good time to switch to airplane mode, so the phones wouldn't chew up battery life looking for service, but we didn't think of that until the next morning.)

Wednesday morning did not bring electricity or cell service. I put the solar charger out to soak up rays after using it to charge my phone. In the morning we took a walk through the neighborhood -- several downed trees or large branches including one blocking Forbes Avenue, no traffic lights, and no visible lights until we got to the center of the neighborhood's business district, where for a couple blocks places had lights. We went for bagels and free wi-fi, and in the afternoon went for coffee and free wi-fi. The coffee shop was overflowing with single people with laptops occupying two-person tables, but their wi-fi extended outside. The grocery store was dark.

It was at the coffee shop that we learned the magnitude of the problem. News was reporting that 450,000 customers were without electricity in the region. For context, the population of the city of Pittsburgh is around 300,000; the greater metro area is around 1M. A residence often has more than one person, though businesses are separately customers, and I don't know how those factors trade off, but still -- holy cow, that's a lot of people! We also learned that a couple people died, unfortunately, one from a live wire in a puddle and one from a tree falling on him. A neighbor told us that another neighbor had spotted a funnel cloud, though I don't know details and the news I saw didn't report this.

I had, to this point, avoided opening the fridge or freezer. In the freezer I pack meat pretty densely, and when we lost power I did some quick rearranging to shore things up even more, use thermal mass where I could, etc. Freezers can be without power for a day if you pack them well; fridges are another matter. I did a quick check of the freezer in case there was meat I needed to use now, and then made dinner out of things from the fridge that were safe right now but soon wouldn't be. (I am so glad I insisted on a gas cooktop. The oven requires electricity for the controls.)

Late Wednesday night cell service came back; the Duquesne Light outage map showed about 150,000 customers without power (down from 250,000 Tuesday night), and they were saying it would take 5-7 days to fully restore power and they were calling in crews from other cities as quickly as they could. The web site looked to be accepting reports now, so I logged our address just in case it mattered for anything. I began thinking about Shabbat contingency plans.

This morning (Thursday) there was still no power, no visible expansion of the powered area from yesterday, and not much change in the tally on the outage page. I identified some meat we should use for lunch, so we went for coffee early (kashrut sequencing issues, the reason I "never" make meat for lunch except Shabbat)). The coffee shop was again full, no surprise. The staff there did a great job of keeping up with what I assume is a far higher load than their usual.

Mid-afternoon today our power came back on. We triaged the freezer -- lost about half the meat despite my efforts, but fortunately we were about to restock chicken but hadn't yet, else it would have been worse. Aside from the things that don't really need much refrigeration anyway (like condiments), the fridge was a loss. (And those eggs were on sale! Ah well...) After the fridge had time to cool down we ventured out to Costco to pick up some things, and we'll get other perishables tomorrow from local stores that are now open.

We were out for about 44 hours. The status page right now says there are still 110,000 customers out, including about 15% of my zip code and 20% of the whole city. I don't know what the current stats are from other power companies. I believe them when they say it'll take 5-7 days to restore it all. Yikes.

Years ago, friends of ours got solar panels and a couple of those Tesla battery walls (before he went crazy, they stress), and they've ridden out several-day outages. I've been saying for a while that I want us to do something for backup power (we don't have solar panels yet). I think I'm getting a little more traction with that idea now, though depending on how the research pans out, I'm leaning toward a natural-gas-fueled standby generator, not a giant battery. But that's a topic for another day.

cellio: (Default)

A restaurant in our neighborhood covers its walls in framed art and photos. A higher proportion than I expected are...quirky. And maybe prescient... (Photos were hard to take because I didn't want to disturb other patrons.) Read more... )

cellio: (Default)

Yesterday the news broke that the people in the US government who were planning a military attack accidentally added a reporter to their group chat. There is pressure for the person who fumbled that to resign or be fired, but so far it looks like that's going to be based on vibes, on how bad the publicity looks.

The person who fumbled that should be removed from positions where he can repeat the mistake, yes. But there is a much bigger problem here. Every person who was on that chat was violating rules of national security. By conducting that chat on Signal, they were violating rules about storing and transmitting classified material. It doesn't matter that Signal is encrypted; classified material has to be stored in specific, managed ways.

Having the conversation on Signal at all was a violation of government policy. Being reckless about who was included is just the cherry on top.

Let me be clear: if you or I, with even a measly little Secret clearance, so much as stored such data on a personal hard drive, we'd be in trouble. If we uploaded it somewhere else, even worse. And if you or I shared classified material with someone who is not cleared, or even is cleared but does not have a need to know (that's a specific designation), we would be in trouble. What kind of trouble? At the very least, loss of clearance and investigation. Quite possibly, fines and even jail time. When I got my security clearance the training was very direct about stuff like this. I never had a higher clearance, but I would expect that both the precautions and the consequences escalate as you get higher up the security ladder.

Everyone who was on that Signal chat knew or should have known that it violated federal rules. Reportedly, the president doesn't think this is a big deal because no harm was done this time. At worst he'll fire one person, letting a scapegoat protect the other goats in the administration. That same president was outraged over a previous candidate's private email server, but, you know, consistency isn't a strong point in this administration.

This isn't about punishment, though punishment should result. I want the supposed guardians of national security to pay as much attention to regulations and OPSEC as low-level government-contractor plebes do.

cellio: (Default)

This is the letter I just sent to my stat's Republican senator, Dave McCormick. (I'll call tomorrow.)

Subject: balance of power: protect the judiciary and congress from the executive branch

Sir,

This past weekend, the President invoked a wartime act, even though only Congress can declare war. When ordered by a judge to stop his illegal deportations, he ignored the order and is now trying to impeach the judge responsible. This isn't the first time he's sought impeachment of judges who ruled against him.

Our republic depends on the balance of power among the three branches of government. Each must be checked by the other two. I urge you to vote against baseless impeachments, and to rally other Senators and Representatives to take back Congress's authority. This isn't a partisan issue; it's an all-of-us issue to avert a constitutional crisis. Now is the time to stand up and restore the rule of law and adherence to the Constitution. Can we count on you to protect our fragile republic?

Thank you.

The power to impeach lies with Congress, not the executive branch. I saw news tonight that some members of Congress are working on the demanded impeachment legislation.

Also, a relevant link (disable Javascript to read the full article).

links

Mar. 10th, 2025 11:21 am
cellio: (Default)

A small link round-up.

Not about current US issues:

  • We can have a different web: "Many yearn for the “good old days” of the web. We could have those good old days back — or something even better — and if anything, it would be easier now than it ever was." As someone who remembers those early days, I found a lot that resonates here. The mega-platforms have the lion's share of the Internet, but those of us who prefer humans to algorithms and personal interests to shareholder profits can still build that. (Hello, Dreamwidth.)

US issues: Read more... )

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags