Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will add the capability to plot both forming and weakening variations of the basic front types that are already implemented. You will certainly see weakening fronts being plotted on WPC frontal analyses and forecasts, though I do not recall the last time I saw a forming front plotted. WPC does indicate that they can plot them here and indicate there can be varying frontal character in surface bulletins here. This also adds a dryline boundary. These also appear in WPC graphical products. However, the coded versions of those same products do not explicitly specify them as drylines. Bottom line is you should be able to get a plot to look like WPC even if their coded products don't necessarily match the specificity of what their graphics have.
There are also a couple of niche weather map symbols: the ridge axis and the squall. These are more about filling out the toolbox for someone who might want to draw a whole weather map using MetPy than anything.
I tried to keep within the same framework that the basic front types had as much as I could. See what you think and we can perhaps improve them in some places.