Skip to content

Conversation

@axtloss
Copy link
Contributor

@axtloss axtloss commented Dec 19, 2024

Adds a new property addincludes which lets the user decide if a stage should include the includes.container

closes #105

@axtloss axtloss requested a review from mirkobrombin December 19, 2024 08:07
Copy link
Member

@taukakao taukakao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why was this approach chosen instead of just checking if the path exists?

@axtloss
Copy link
Contributor Author

axtloss commented Dec 19, 2024

This is per stage, a user may want to include it during the testing stage but not the building stage, just checking if the directory exists wouldn't help

@taukakao
Copy link
Member

taukakao commented Dec 19, 2024

I see, interesting. But yeah, makes sense to me.

@axtloss axtloss merged commit 45896f2 into main Dec 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@axtloss axtloss deleted the feat/optional-includes branch December 20, 2024 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: add property to decide if a stage should get sources and/or includes added

4 participants