[intro.execution] Sequencing of evaluations inside called functions CWG2466

[jensmaurer]

After application of CWG2466, the note that immediately follows the changed text:

[Note 7 : If A and B would not otherwise be sequenced then they are indeterminately sequenced. — end note]

is no longer good: A and B no longer exist, and we've actually changed the normative text to say "A before all B or all A before B", so "indeterminately sequenced" no longer fits directly.

The note should be struck.

[jensmaurer]

Fixed by #4693