P1467R9 Extended floating-point types and standard names #5670
Conversation
jensmaurer
force-pushed
the
motions-2022-07-cwg-14
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1b205b3 to
5533527
Compare
tkoeppe
force-pushed
the
motions-2022-07-cwg-14
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ec0f5aa to
3c57442
Compare
| then it is effectively cast to \tcode{complex<T>}. | ||
| \item | ||
| Otherwise, if the argument has integer type, | ||
| then it is effectively cast to \tcode{complex<double>}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should probably use \keyword for double etc., but we can fix that later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think \keyword is used on the library clauses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
At least not with any form of consistency. @jensmaurer Do you recall if we have a policy/plan for using \keyword in the library?
(No immediate action needed here.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you recall if we have a policy/plan for using \keyword in the library?
We haven't discussed this in any detail, but if the plan for C++ is approximately that of C in that we want all mentions of keywords colored a little bit (or so), then we should use \keyword everywhere in prose text and configure codeblock accordingly.
Currently, we really want all keywords in the core section to be annotated, because there will be index entries for them.
|
Section [complex.special] is supposed to be removed in its entirety. The explicit specializations for |
|
@tkoeppe, for your convenience, I've pushed the changes discussed by @dkolsen-pgi , except for |
Thank you so much! |
tkoeppe
force-pushed
the
motions-2022-07-cwg-14
branch
from
8658a80 to
9aa76a2
Compare
Fixes #5579
Fixes cplusplus/papers#227
Also fixes #1247