added {include with blocks} as a successor to {includeblock}

[dg]

• bug fix? ~
• new feature? yes
• BC break? no

There are use cases where {includeblock} is useful and cannot be substituted by {import}. But the name {includeblock} is misleading. This is attempt to solve it by more understandable {include with blocks 'file.latte'}

Cons: this introduces syntax which is not common in Latte.

https://forum.nette.org/cs/26699-latte-vypis-bloku-do-include

[JanTvrdik]

I hate the syntax. Also include related stuff are changed way too often -> deeper analysis is required.

[dg]

Do you have a better idea about syntax?

[JanTvrdik]

Not yet. I don't want to rush this change just to change it in two weeks again.

[dg]

I don't know what are you talking about.

[f3l1x]

The syntax {include-with-blocks} is forbidden?

[dg]

{include-with-blocks} is not common in Latte too. More expectable is {includewithblocks} (hard to read) or {includeWithBlocks}.

[dg]

Changed to {include file.latte with blocks}