-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
merge: from 3.3.6 to main branch #33290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ference handling (#33282)
fix: adjust rocksdb log
Summary of ChangesHello @guanshengliang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates two targeted improvements from the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request appears to be a merge from a release branch. The changes include increasing the maximum value for the rpcRecvLogThreshold configuration and fixing an error handling issue in thread creation. My review focuses on the configuration change, where the new maximum value seems unusually large and might be a typo. I've also pointed out a minor style inconsistency.
| TAOS_CHECK_RETURN(cfgAddInt32(pCfg, "rpcRecvLogThreshold", tsRpcRecvLogThreshold, 1, 1024, CFG_SCOPE_SERVER, CFG_DYN_SERVER,CFG_CATEGORY_LOCAL)); | ||
| TAOS_CHECK_RETURN(cfgAddInt32(pCfg, "streamBatchRequestWaitMs", tsStreamBatchRequestWaitMs, 0, 30 * 60 * 1000, CFG_SCOPE_SERVER, CFG_DYN_NONE,CFG_CATEGORY_LOCAL)); | ||
|
|
||
| TAOS_CHECK_RETURN(cfgAddInt32(pCfg, "rpcRecvLogThreshold", tsRpcRecvLogThreshold, 1, 1024*1024, CFG_SCOPE_SERVER, CFG_DYN_SERVER,CFG_CATEGORY_LOCAL)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The maximum value for rpcRecvLogThreshold has been increased from 1024 to 1024*1024 (1,048,576). According to the comment for tsRpcRecvLogThreshold on line 406, the unit is seconds. This new maximum value is approximately 12 days, which seems excessively high for an RPC receive log threshold. Could you please confirm if this value is correct and not a typo? If the unit is intended to be milliseconds, the variable name and associated comments should be updated for clarity.
Additionally, for consistency with other parts of the file (e.g., lines 970-971), please add spaces around the multiplication operator: 1024 * 1024.
TAOS_CHECK_RETURN(cfgAddInt32(pCfg, "rpcRecvLogThreshold", tsRpcRecvLogThreshold, 1, 1024 * 1024, CFG_SCOPE_SERVER, CFG_DYN_SERVER,CFG_CATEGORY_LOCAL));| (void)taosThreadAttrSetDetachState(&thAttr, PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE); | ||
|
|
||
| if (taosThreadCreate(&pWorker->thread, &thAttr, (ThreadFp)tQueryAutoQWorkerThreadFp, pWorker) != 0) { | ||
| terrno = TSDB_CODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous implementation incorrectly overwrote terrno with TSDB_CODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY, masking the actual error from taosThreadCreate. This change correctly logs the error from terrno, which is a significant improvement in error handling. However, taosThreadCreate might fail for reasons other than out of memory, and the old code would not have captured that. It is good that you are now logging the actual error.
Description
Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.
Checklist
Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.