-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
enh(test): insert data in parallel #33429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kailixu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to improve test execution time by running data insertion tests in parallel using a ThreadPoolExecutor. While the move to parallel execution is a good enhancement, there is a critical thread-safety issue in the implementation. A new database connection object is created for each thread, but helper methods called within the threads still use a global, shared connection object. This will lead to race conditions and unpredictable test outcomes. This critical issue must be addressed for the parallel execution to work correctly.
| tdLog.info(f'[Begin]{dbname}.{stbname} {ctbname}, oklist:%d, kolist:%d, TDDataType:%s'%(len(oklist), len(kolist), dtype)) | ||
| # tdSql.checkEqual(34, len(oklist) + len(kolist)) | ||
|
|
||
| tdSql = tdCom.newtdSql() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While creating a new tdSql instance here is a good step towards thread safety, the _query_check method called by __insert_query_common still uses the global tdSql object, which is not thread-safe.
__insert_query_common creates a local tdSql variable. However, when it calls self._query_check(...) (e.g., on line 318), the _query_check method uses the global tdSql object initialized in the init method.
This will cause race conditions between the parallel threads executing the tests, as they will all share and modify the state of the same tdSql object (e.g., its cursor and query results). This can lead to unpredictable test failures and incorrect results.
To fix this, the thread-local tdSql object should be passed to and used by _query_check and any other helper methods it calls.
Description
Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.
Checklist
Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.