Skip to content

Conversation

@tomchon
Copy link
Contributor

@tomchon tomchon commented Oct 31, 2025

Description

Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?

@tomchon tomchon requested a review from feici02 as a code owner October 31, 2025 09:06
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tomchon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a Docker configuration by removing an explicit dependency on openjdk-17-jre-headless from the base Dockerfile. This change likely aims to optimize the Docker image, resolve potential build conflicts, or reduce the overall image size by eliminating an unnecessary or redundant package installation.

Highlights

  • Dockerfile Cleanup: The openjdk-17-jre-headless package has been removed from the Dockerfile.base installation list, streamlining the base Docker image.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Member

@feici02 feici02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@feici02 feici02 merged commit a4e3f9f into main Oct 31, 2025
1 check passed
@feici02 feici02 deleted the enh/main-docker-1 branch October 31, 2025 09:08
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the openjdk-17-jre-headless package from the Dockerfile.base. This is a positive change that reduces the Docker image size and attack surface by removing a dependency that appears to be no longer necessary. The change is consistent with the fact that tdengine-datasource.zip, which historically contained Java components, is removed during the build process in the main Dockerfile. This indicates that a Java runtime is not required in the final image. The change is correct and improves the overall efficiency of the Docker packaging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants