Skip to content

Conversation

@cadem
Copy link
Contributor

@cadem cadem commented Nov 5, 2025

Description

Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @cadem, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and clarity of the snapshot synchronization mechanism. It addresses a subtle bug in signature comparison logic, ensuring correct flow control. Additionally, it refines logging messages to provide more precise feedback during snapshot writer operations and improves code readability by adding explanatory comments to complex conditional logic.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: The snapshotReceiverSignatureCmp function now correctly returns the comparison result (code) instead of always returning 0, which was a logical error.
  • Improved Logging: Error and informational messages within the snapshotReceiverStartWriter function have been updated for enhanced clarity and consistency, specifically by adding 'writer' to relevant messages and refining an existing error message.
  • Code Readability: Comments have been added to the syncNodeOnSnapshotPrep function to explicitly clarify the logic branches based on the return value of the snapshotReceiverSignatureCmp function.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a critical bug in snapshotReceiverSignatureCmp where it would always return 0, preventing correct handling of snapshot messages. The change to return the actual comparison result is a good first step. However, I've identified a remaining logical flaw in the same function where the comparison precedence between term and startTime is not correctly handled, which could lead to incorrect behavior. I've provided a detailed comment with a suggested fix for this critical issue. The other changes in this PR are minor but useful improvements to logging messages and comments, which enhance code clarity.

@cadem cadem requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2025 08:06
@guanshengliang guanshengliang merged commit b721e14 into 3.3.6 Nov 7, 2025
17 of 19 checks passed
@cadem cadem deleted the fix/TD-38495-snapshot-start-receiver-writer-error branch November 10, 2025 04:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants