Psychiatric Drug Facts via breggin.com :

“Most psychiatric drugs can cause withdrawal reactions, sometimes including life-threatening emotional and physical withdrawal problems… Withdrawal from psychiatric drugs should be done carefully under experienced clinical supervision.” Dr. Peter Breggin
Showing posts with label Study 329. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Study 329. Show all posts

Sep 16, 2015

Study 329 in the news

Image
photo via Funny or Die

via Robinson Research Institute:

Study 329 Restored


via: Study329.org SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY THROUGH DATA BASED MEDICINE:

Band of Intrepid Researchers "Sets the Record Straight" on Ghostwritten Study

an excerpt:
"Toronto (September 16, 2015) — Today the BMJ published Restoring Study 329, a decade-long effort by researchers to uncover the truth about the safety of an antidepressant approved for use by adolescents. Restoring Study 329 is a reanalysis and rebuttal of the original Study 329 ..." more here

Psychiatry’s Thalidomide Moment

an excerpt: 

Study Details and Findings

"The authors of Study 329 began recruiting adolescents for a comparative study of Paxil, imipramine and placebo in 1994 and finished their investigations in 1997. They dropped a large number of their original cohort, so the randomness element in the study must be open to question. Late in 1998, SmithKline Beecham, (henceforth GSK) the marketers of Paxil, acknowledged in an internal document that the study had shown that Paxil didn’t work for adolescents in terms of the two primary and six secondary outcomes they had established at the start of the study. In a nutshell, Study 329 was negative for efficacy and positive for harm, contrary to their succinct upbeat conclusion. Adjudging, of course, that this lack of benefit and presence of risks could not be communicated to an innocent public, the team’s task was now to see how bad news could be transformed into good. They decided then that they would cherry-pick the few positives they might glean from their mass of data and publish these. This, however, required them to abandon nearly all of their original outcome measures and dredge up a few new ones, abandoning the symptoms in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D),which they originally invoked and which is the normal scale used in such studies.

"The article had first been rejected by JAMA..." read here

 

Jan 8, 2012

Every Parent Who Has a Child or Teenager Needs to Read This!

Image

Leonie Fennel lost her son, Shane Clancy, to suicide in 2009.  She now spends her time working to inform other parents of the suicidal risk of SSRIs; a class of drugs used for depression.  She does this to honor her son's memory.  I can't help but be humbled to know that she is honoring her son's memory by trying to save strangers.  She lost her son and wasn't even aware that committing suicide is a well-known risk of the drug, Cipramil, or Celexa when Shane was prescribed the drug.  After Shane died, Leonie found out that the risk of the drug causing suicidal and homicidal behavior---particularly in young people---was well known to the drug's maker, Lundbeck.  This is a well known serious, negative effect of all SSRI and SSNRI antidepressants.

The Government drug safety regulators approve the drugs and work for the people in the U.S., in the UK, in Ireland and in New Zealand were aware of the fatal risks; and the drugs were approved in each country, with this risk known to the regulators.   Across the globe, regulatory authorities determined they had no duty to inform the general public, or the prescribing professionals, of fatal risks known to be inherent with this class of drug.

Here in the U.S., the FDA claims it hasd no duty to disclose that SSRI and SSNRI drugs can be fatal; it's a "trade secret."  How in the hell can a fatal risk be kept a secret from the people who are prescribed the drugs?  It is the FDA's job to determine whether the drugs are safe and efficacious treatments for the conditions the FDA approves them for.  No treatment is without risks, it is also the FDA's duty to ensure that risks are identified and fully disclosed---period.  How can the identified risks of FDA approved drugs be something that the FDA hides from the American people?  The FDA works for the people, not for the drug companies.  The FDA drug approval process is obviously corrupted by the drug industry negligent .  Time and again, the FDA has failed to protect the American people by approving drugs on insufficient and/or corrupt data. The FDA does not require prescribing professionals to report adverse events associated with FDA approved drugs.  The FDA does not actually require drug makers to do the 'required' after market drug trials on the drugs approved through the PDUFA process.  In effect, and in fact, the FDA has not been fulfilling it's protective or regulatory duties for decades; it continues to fail these duties, with seeming impunity.

Another mother, Maria Bradshaw, lives in New Zealand.  Maria's son, Toran Henry, committed suicide due to a toxic reaction from fluoxetinealso known as Prozac, and Serafem.  Maria, is the co-founder of 'CASPER' or, Community Action on Suicide Prevention Education and Research in New Zealand.  Maria stated, "I'm looking for an end to giving kids who are sad or distressed, drugs that double their risk of suicide. I'm looking for the appalling rate of child suicide in my country to be reduced. I want my son, my only child, to have a legacy and I need to feel I'm still his mother and promoting his best interests and this is the only way I know how to parent a dead child."  


I am humbled by these two mother's tremendous effort to inform other parents about what each of them has  learned after their sons were dead.  These mother's are driven, by the tremendous love they have for their children.  They know that love alone cannot prevent suicide, and they know that what we do not know about prescription drugs puts our children at risk, and can even kill them.   Leonie and Maria know that no parent should grieve the loss of a child because of not being fully informed about known risks.  What these mother's were not told about the drugs prescribed their sons prevented them from protecting their sons from the risk

Their sons, Toran Henry and Shane Clancy, will never be forgotten...We all owe Leonie and Maria a tremendous debt of gratitude.  These moms share their stories to warn other parents about drug dangers in hopes of sparing them and their children from experiencing what they have.  I am humbled to know of these remarkable women.  These mothers have experienced tremendous loss due to the betrayal of professionals who abdicated their primary ethical duty when researching, seeking regulatory approval and marketing SSRI drugs.  I am inspired by their tremendous effort for all of us.

Be sure and read the list Leonie has posted on "Lundbeck's Hall of Shame."
Far too many lives have already been lost...

via Leonie Fennel's Blog:
Image
Lundbeck's Hall of Shame
"Since Shane died in 2009 we have tried, and will continue to try, to warn the public that antidepressants can cause suicide and/or homicide. We have Professor Healy’s expert report which states that, in his opinion, Cipramil caused the events of 2009 (It’s attached to the side-bar on the right if anyone needs any information). During the last 2 years and 5 months, we have had to contend with denials and rebuttals from Lundbeck (surprise, surprise) and Ireland’s Psychiatric body, the College of Psychiatry of Ireland; Statements such as this one from Prof. T. Dinan…"
read Leonnie's blog Lundbeck's Hall of Shame


via crookreport.co.uk



photo credit

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted
(C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.