SHR Media

AF THEMES

Home » Disclaimer & Editorial Policy

Disclaimer & Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy & Disclaimer

SHR Media Editorial Policy and Network Standards

The Editorial Policy of SHR Media keeps our news fair. Specifically, we offer opinion and satire on the news. Also, all views belong to the hosts or guests alone.

Our Editorial Policy on Integrity

Our Editorial Policy keeps us free. Plus, each show host makes their own choices. So, no outside group tells us what to say. Therefore, we stay true to the law and our rights.

Collaborative Reporting Standards

At SHR Media, we believe in the power of a unified voice when defending constitutional principles. Articles published under the "SHR Media Staff" byline represent a collaborative reporting effort. Furthermore, these pieces are drafted and vetted by members of our network to ensure they meet our standards for primary source research and constitutional literacy. By leveraging our collective expertise, we prioritize factual source documents over partisan narratives.

Ads and Third-Party Rules

We use ads from Google on this site. Also, these ads use cookies to track your visits. However, an ad does not mean we back that group. So, read the full FTC Disclosure here.

Facts and Fixes

We want our Editorial Policy to be clear on the facts. If we make a mistake, we will fix it fast. Plus, you can tell us about errors on our Contact Page.

Opinion and Satire

Much of our work is opinion or satire. Specifically, you should think about the context of our shows. Also, our hosts speak their own minds at all times.

Standard Disclosures

Human-Led Content: SHR Media may utilize technology for research or formatting; however, all editorial content is written and finalized by human contributors. Additionally, we link to external primary sources for educational purposes. Consequently, we are not responsible for the privacy practices of third-party sites. Finally, cornerstone articles are based on factual documents available at the time of publication, and analysis may evolve as constitutional debates continue.