If $LIBRA launched on @nirvana_fi it would have a floor price of $12.43 and a market price of $28.37.
You can't rugpull when under the rug is a concrete slab.
As far as I can tell, $ANA is the best performing digital asset since it launched (4 months ago).
As in *across all* digital assets in the entire sector.
There are reasons for this. @nirvana_fi is changing the paradigm for the next chapter of internet finance.
Crash to the floor campaign is coming.
Step 1: Make demo Nirvana massive
Step 2: Plunge with abandon, and watch it hold.
Step 3: Make real $ANA massive
Nirvanaโs philosophy getting more vindicated every day.
Launching sans cabal might mean a less than flashy start ($ANA up 600% rather than 60,000%).
But the all-organic foundation is built to last. Not burn up in a flash.
A zen koan:
When Saylor buys the last Bitcoin, and finally hodls it all, the value goes to zero.
The river that flows into itself becomes a stagnant pond.
But own 99% of $ANA? You hold an ocean of dollars. To own the token is to own its liquidity.
This SIMD-228 drama on @solana is something else.
I was talking to someone who runs a validator - and the sense is there is a concentrated monolith of voting power which can't be stopped.
Big binary decisions are how conventional gov works. The @nirvana_fi style is better.
nfa and all that,
but fyi this is how Nirvana (an antiponzi) works:
If $ANA goes up, the floor price goes up.
And - assuming you bought $ANA - eventually the floor price gets higher than your entry price.
Which means permanent profit.
Simple, zen, pink: @nirvana_fi .
This is why I was asking what to name the $SOL version of @nirvana_fi
and, for those just tuning in, the fees will be used to buy and burn $ANA
SOLified ANA will be a very different kind of game.