bpo-36540 What's New section for PEP 570#12942
Conversation
|
Thanks for doing this! I will land this after GH-12701 as this is more likely to have merge conflicts (as it has as the time of writing this) and I prefer not to rebase multiple times a PR that is already very big. Also, I will make a separate PR with all the doc changes that are more likely to need native speaker reviews. |
a50e9d7 to
eab7dbf
Compare
|
OK, fixed the merge conflict (of my own making). Are you gonna make alpha 4? |
That's my intention but I am still waiting for a review from @serhiy-storchaka (Victor already approved). If we are very close to the date, I would like to merge it (maybe without the changes in inspect as Serhiy suggested) and then we can fix particular details afterwards. |
pganssle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other than my one optional style note, I see no problems with the grammar and style of this.
|
I'll leave it up to Pablo.
|
eab7dbf to
9923819
Compare
@pablogsal You can either copy this into GH-12701 or land it after that has landed.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36540