Conversation
|
r? @weihanglo (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
| ### Documentation Updates | ||
|
|
||
| ## Edition 2024 | ||
| * Tracking Issue: (none created yet) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No tracking issue has been created yet, so this will have to be updated to include a link when the RFC gets merged and a tracking issue gets created.
If there is a tracking issue for cargo and rust, both links should probably be included.
| Edition2015 => false, | ||
| Edition2018 => true, | ||
| Edition2021 => true, | ||
| Edition2024 => false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While there currently is rust_2024_compatibility lint group, I set it to false as there are no lints in the group currently (from what I can tell). This was how Edition2021 originally was before it was updated to be true.
|
@bors r+ |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
RFC for
Edition2024. While the RFC is not yet merged, this follows rustc which added the 2024 edition previously in rust-lang/rust#94461This PR adds
Edition2024as a possible value foredition = "xxxx". I did this by following the guide here.