Ignore errors when including clear_expected_if_blessed

[tmiasko]

Include is there only for the effect executing the rule. The file is not intended to be remade successfully to be actually included.

I erroneously changed this in #100912.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[ehuss]

I'm going to approve to get CI working again. It looks like this was an unfortunate coincidence that the - was removed, and GNU Make 4.4 was very recently released which changed the behavior to generate an error in this circumstance.

@bors r+ p=10

[bors]

📌 Commit c1d5a5a has been approved by ehuss

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 10. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit c1d5a5a with merge b359ccf...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: ehuss
Pushing b359ccf to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b359ccf): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.9%	[0.9%, 0.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.