Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues#134943
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Mar 1, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
Author
|
r? @cjgillot |
Shunpoco
force-pushed
the
116971-mir-opt-issues
branch
from
5f9d9e5 to
9ec1fc0
Compare
From rust-lang#123067, this test should ensure that there is no duplicated basic block against or-patterns. Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <[email protected]>
Shunpoco
force-pushed
the
116971-mir-opt-issues
branch
from
9ec1fc0 to
7061551
Compare
Member
|
r? DianQK |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
…DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
…DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
This was referenced Feb 28, 2025
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134943 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues) - rust-lang#137017 (Don't error when adding a staticlib with bitcode files compiled by newer LLVM) - rust-lang#137197 (Update some comparison codegen tests now that they pass in LLVM20) - rust-lang#137540 (Fix (more) test directives that were accidentally ignored) - rust-lang#137551 (import `simd_` intrinsics) - rust-lang#137599 (tests: use minicore more) - rust-lang#137673 (Fix Windows `Command` search path bug) - rust-lang#137676 (linker: Fix escaping style for response files on Windows) - rust-lang#137693 (Re-enable `--generate-link-to-defintion` for tools internal rustdoc) - rust-lang#137770 (Fix sized constraint for unsafe binder) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134943 - Shunpoco:116971-mir-opt-issues, r=DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This resolves a part of #116971 .
The directory
tests/mir-opt/issueshas only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations.Originally it was introduced in #75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in #123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.