Conversation
|
@bors try |
CI: split i686-msvc job try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-2
766ddbf to
3bb38a0
Compare
|
(@marcoieni btw, your PR says |
|
omg, sorry, I'm fixing this 😅 |
|
Fixed. I was lucky. The number of failures during the last month is the same (3). 👍 |
|
@bors try |
CI: split i686-msvc job try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-2
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
|
@bors r+ rollup=never |
CI: split i686-msvc job try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-2
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
another job (different from this one) failed in the auto build, so it should still be fine to merge this |
|
Well, this PR has actually changed what gets executed in the CI job that has failed 😅 But the failure is indeed spurious :) @bors retry |
CI: split i686-msvc job try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-2
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
@bors retry |
CI: split i686-msvc job try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-2
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
Hmm, it looks like the MSVC change maybe increases the spurious failures? Maybe we should revert that change. |
|
Wait, this only changes i686-msvc right? So why is x86_64-msvc being affected? |
3bb38a0 to
a48e7b0
Compare
|
Luckily github is lying and the PR wasn't merged |
|
anyway, I'll open a new PR 👍 |
|
opened #135616 👍 |



Split the i686-msvc job in two to move it to free runners and reduce the use of large runners in CI. Related to rust-lang/infra-team#189
This PR is similar to #133632 however the job
i686-msvcfails less often thanx86_64-msvcin CI, so it can be split more safely.In the last month, this job failed only 3 times:
Datadog link for the infra team.
r? @Kobzol
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-2