Rollup of 5 pull requests#139257

TaKO8Ki · 2025-04-02T13:52:48Z

Successful merges:

Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment #139178 (Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment)
Add unstable --print=crate-root-lint-levels #139184 (Add unstable --print=crate-root-lint-levels)
Add opt-level = "s" for more std symbolication crates #139215 (Add opt-level = "s" for more std symbolication crates)
Move methods from Map to TyCtxt, part 5. #139232 (Move methods from Map to TyCtxt, part 5.)
Remove aux_build run-make rustc helpers #139239 (Remove aux_build run-make rustc helpers)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

This eliminates all methods on `Map`. Actually removing `Map` will occur in a follow-up PR.

They provide very little value and makes it more confusing than is helpful.

…-assighment, r=cjgillot Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Review.20for.20.23137465/with/508540539). To be clear, this is not a value judgement, it's just a way to improve our fairness when assigning reviews, trying to find a balance between leaving time to Rust contributors review on their terms and availability and avoid having PRs waiting for too long. > [!IMPORTANT] > This is not a final decision! Rust contributors are free to re-add themselves back to the active review rotation (if they feel like it) once they have more availability. cc: `@cjgillot`

…eyouxu Add unstable `--print=crate-root-lint-levels` This PR implements `--print=crate-root-lint-levels` from MCP 833 rust-lang/compiler-team#833. Tracking issue: rust-lang#139180 Best reviewed commit by commit.

Add `opt-level = "s"` for more std symbolication crates This reduces the size of a hello world binary built by stage 1 in release by a few kilobytes

Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 5. This eliminates all methods on `Map`. Actually removing `Map` will occur in a follow-up PR. A follow-up to rust-lang#137504. r? `@Zalathar`

Remove `aux_build` run-make rustc helpers They provide very little value and makes it more confusing than is helpful. Helps with rust-lang#138066. r? `@Kobzol`

TaKO8Ki · 2025-04-02T13:53:02Z

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

bors · 2025-04-02T13:53:05Z

📌 Commit abcfc3e has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2025-04-02T14:17:14Z

⌛ Testing commit abcfc3e with merge 4f0de4c...

bors · 2025-04-02T17:59:14Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: TaKO8Ki
Pushing 4f0de4c to master...

rust-timer · 2025-04-02T18:00:41Z

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#139178	Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment	`f9d53c4223e9a1adada0850e46d83c8280997bf8` (link)
#139184	Add unstable `--print=crate-root-lint-levels`	`8713ba6ec1cda427ae1375a0f62328005ef1e07b` (link)
#139215	Add `opt-level = "s"` for more std symbolication crates	`17108a4cea1d2bee70a1a5f6a5aad90ad51805a7` (link)
#139232	Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 5.	`5c9cf68c2c9b41db1c6d2f1d74d933e389d5f806` (link)
#139239	Remove `aux_build` run-make rustc helpers	`60747784583c15061f1a39e292fe6e887ec0e0d3` (link)

previous master: ae9173d7dd

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

github-actions · 2025-04-02T18:01:00Z

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing ae9173d (parent) -> 4f0de4c (this PR)

Test differences

Show 34 test diffs

Stage 1

[run-make] tests/run-make/print-crate-root-lint-levels: [missing] -> pass (J0)
[ui] tests/ui/print-request/stability.rs#crate_root_lint_levels: [missing] -> pass (J0)

Stage 2

[run-make] tests/run-make/print-crate-root-lint-levels: [missing] -> pass (J1)
[ui] tests/ui/print-request/stability.rs#crate_root_lint_levels: [missing] -> pass (J2)

Additionally, 30 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

J0: x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-3, x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-3
J1: aarch64-apple, aarch64-gnu, aarch64-gnu-debug, arm-android, armhf-gnu, dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl, dist-various-1, i686-gnu-1, i686-gnu-nopt-1, i686-msvc-1, test-various, x86_64-apple-1, x86_64-gnu, x86_64-gnu-debug, x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-1, x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-2, x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-1, x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-2, x86_64-gnu-nopt, x86_64-gnu-stable, x86_64-mingw-1, x86_64-msvc-1
J2: aarch64-apple, aarch64-gnu, arm-android, armhf-gnu, dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl, i686-gnu-1, i686-gnu-nopt-1, i686-msvc-1, test-various, x86_64-apple-2, x86_64-gnu, x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-1, x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-2, x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-1, x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-2, x86_64-gnu-nopt, x86_64-gnu-stable, x86_64-mingw-1, x86_64-msvc-1

Job duration changes

aarch64-apple: 4030.5s -> 7599.4s (88.5%)
x86_64-apple-1: 6368.2s -> 10702.2s (68.1%)
dist-x86_64-apple: 9179.4s -> 12579.4s (37.0%)
dist-apple-various: 7429.5s -> 9655.5s (30.0%)
dist-x86_64-linux: 4877.5s -> 5564.4s (14.1%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-3: 6631.2s -> 7144.1s (7.7%)
x86_64-gnu-distcheck: 4411.0s -> 4725.9s (7.1%)
x86_64-mingw-2: 6820.8s -> 7252.4s (6.3%)
i686-msvc-1: 9387.3s -> 9961.8s (6.1%)
dist-loongarch64-musl: 5401.0s -> 5720.8s (5.9%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

rust-timer · 2025-04-02T20:36:26Z

Finished benchmarking commit (4f0de4c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
a new PR with a fix for the regression.
If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.4%]	13
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.6%]	32
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.7%, -0.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.7%, 0.4%]	17

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.9%, secondary -1.7%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.2%	[1.6%, 4.9%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.3%	[2.2%, 5.4%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-3.2%, -1.5%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-4.6%, -1.0%]	12
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.9%	[-3.2%, 4.9%]	7

Cycles

Results (primary -0.7%, secondary -2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.8%, -0.7%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-3.6%, -1.1%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.8%, -0.7%]	3

Binary size

Results (primary -0.4%, secondary -1.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-2.1%, -0.0%]	40
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-2.1%, -0.2%]	45
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-2.1%, 0.0%]	41

Bootstrap: 776.507s -> 776.833s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 366.05 MiB -> 365.93 MiB (-0.03%)

rylev · 2025-04-08T15:56:44Z

Found the cause in #139232 (comment)

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

Urgau and others added 13 commits March 31, 2025 17:58

Expose LintLevelsBuilder with crate root builder

1238a20

Expose registered_tools directly without TyCtxt-query

69cb0a9

Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment

ebca98f

Add unstable --print=crate-root-lint-levels

df18de5

Add opt-level = "s" for more std symbolication crates

4c92418

Move methods from Map to TyCtxt, part 5.

6713f34

This eliminates all methods on `Map`. Actually removing `Map` will occur in a follow-up PR.

Drop aux_build rustc helpers

b591eb0

They provide very little value and makes it more confusing than is helpful.

Update run-make tests to no longer use aux_build

f31bd74

Rollup merge of rust-lang#139215 - clubby789:std-size-tweaks, r=joboet

5df0c68

Add `opt-level = "s"` for more std symbolication crates This reduces the size of a hello world binary built by stage 1 in release by a few kilobytes

Rollup merge of rust-lang#139232 - nnethercote:remove-Map-5, r=Zalathar

bda2ea4

Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 5. This eliminates all methods on `Map`. Actually removing `Map` will occur in a follow-up PR. A follow-up to rust-lang#137504. r? `@Zalathar`

Rollup merge of rust-lang#139239 - jieyouxu:run-make-aux-build, r=Kobzol

abcfc3e

Remove `aux_build` run-make rustc helpers They provide very little value and makes it more confusing than is helpful. Helps with rust-lang#138066. r? `@Kobzol`

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 2, 2025

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 2, 2025

bors merged commit 4f0de4c into rust-lang:master Apr 2, 2025
7 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 2, 2025

rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Apr 2, 2025

Kobzol mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2025

Move methods from Map to TyCtxt, part 5. #139232

Merged

rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Apr 8, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Rollup of 5 pull requests#139257