Make sure to propagate result from visit_expr_fields#142587
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 17, 2025
Merged
Make sure to propagate result from visit_expr_fields#142587bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
visit_expr_fields#142587bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @davidtwco rustbot has assigned @davidtwco. Use |
Contributor
Author
|
Found a few more unhandled results, so I folded them into this PR. |
Member
|
r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise) - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`) - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups) - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.) - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism) - #142570 (Reject union default field values) - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion) - #142585 (Update books) - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup <!-- homu-ignore:start --> [Create a similar rollup](https://bors.rust-lang.org/queue/rust?prs=138538,141946,142216,142542,142563,142570,142584,142585,142586,142587,142595,142598,142601) <!-- homu-ignore:end --> try-job: dist-apple-various
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
…lds, r=jieyouxu Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields` We weren't propagating the `ControlFlow::Break` out of a struct field, which means that the solution implemented in rust-lang#130443 didn't work for nested fields. Fixes rust-lang#142525.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
…lds, r=jieyouxu Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields` We weren't propagating the `ControlFlow::Break` out of a struct field, which means that the solution implemented in rust-lang#130443 didn't work for nested fields. Fixes rust-lang#142525.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #141061 (Change __rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable to be a function) - #142585 (Update books) - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #141061 (Change __rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable to be a function) - #142585 (Update books) - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup <!-- homu-ignore:start --> [Create a similar rollup](https://bors.rust-lang.org/queue/rust?prs=141061,142585,142586,142587,142595,142598,142601) <!-- homu-ignore:end --> try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise) - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`) - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups) - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.) - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism) - #142570 (Reject union default field values) - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion) - #142585 (Update books) - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
Rollup merge of #142587 - compiler-errors:try-visit-expr-fields, r=jieyouxu Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields` We weren't propagating the `ControlFlow::Break` out of a struct field, which means that the solution implemented in #130443 didn't work for nested fields. Fixes #142525.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise) - rust-lang/rust#141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`) - rust-lang/rust#142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups) - rust-lang/rust#142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.) - rust-lang/rust#142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism) - rust-lang/rust#142570 (Reject union default field values) - rust-lang/rust#142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion) - rust-lang/rust#142585 (Update books) - rust-lang/rust#142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - rust-lang/rust#142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - rust-lang/rust#142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - rust-lang/rust#142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - rust-lang/rust#142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2025
…kingjubilee Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise) - rust-lang#141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`) - rust-lang#142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups) - rust-lang#142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.) - rust-lang#142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism) - rust-lang#142570 (Reject union default field values) - rust-lang#142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion) - rust-lang#142585 (Update books) - rust-lang#142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator) - rust-lang#142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`) - rust-lang#142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`) - rust-lang#142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi) - rust-lang#142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We weren't propagating the
ControlFlow::Breakout of a struct field, which means that the solution implemented in #130443 didn't work for nested fields.Fixes #142525.