[Doc] Explain why thread::yield_now could be used.#41982
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom May 16, 2017
Merged
[Doc] Explain why thread::yield_now could be used.#41982bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
thread::yield_now could be used.#41982bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
gamazeps
changed the title
thread::yield_now could be used.thread::yield_now could be used.
gamazeps
force-pushed
the
thread-yield-now
branch
from
da17932 to
7a27e26
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
r? @rust-lang/docs |
src/libstd/thread/mod.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sentence is a bit confusing. "the poll then yield" for example is a bit hard to understand with just one reading. Don't hesitate to make the sentence longer if it helps the reader to understand more easily.
gamazeps
force-pushed
the
thread-yield-now
branch
from
7a27e26 to
a9cb094
Compare
Member
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit a9cb094 has been approved by |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2017
[Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of #29378. r? @steveklabnik
Mark-Simulacrum
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
Member
|
Looks like tests just... hung? Stopped? I can't really tell. Either way, there's practically no way for that to be the fault of this PR. @bors retry |
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit a9cb094 with merge 4c409dd... |
frewsxcv
added
the
A-docs
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
Member
@bors retry
|
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2017
…umeGomez [Doc] Explain why `thread::yield_now` could be used. Part of rust-lang#29378. r? @steveklabnik
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #29378.
r? @steveklabnik