Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by#42169
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom May 26, 2017
Merged
Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by#42169bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split.
Member
|
@bors: r+ Thanks! |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 794e572 has been approved by |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
arielb1
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2017
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split.
Old issue: #27741
New issue: #42168
r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR #42110 (comment))