Allow variant discriminant initializers to refer to other initializer…#50072
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Apr 26, 2018
Merged
Allow variant discriminant initializers to refer to other initializer…#50072bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
oli-obk
added
the
beta-nominated
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 19, 2018
src/librustc/ty/mod.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like this was cut off (missing "and"?).
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 19, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Self-reminder that this check should always apply (i.e. be higher up than the variant check) because of things like Enum::Variant as Enum.
Contributor
|
So this basically narrowly allows referring to other variants, as long as you cast it to an int? |
Contributor
Author
|
Yes. This is what was happening before, too. |
oli-obk
force-pushed
the
discriminants
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9c9793a to
3e35d77
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@eddyb done |
oli-obk
added
the
T-compiler
emilyalbini
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
2 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
Ping @eddyb |
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 24, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/probably isize and thus doesn't need to know/always an integer and (hopefully) doesn't need to know
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 24, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the source binding is of different type
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about the result of calling .to_ref()?
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 24, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can this mk_const be deduplicated between the two match arms?
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 24, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this need to take tcx? It should have cx in scope - worst case, you do a let tcx = cx.tcx(); before the closure.
eddyb
reviewed
Apr 25, 2018
src/librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, if I think more about this, mk_const should also call .to_ref(), to reduce the number of calls further (and to avoid having an inner source variable too.
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Member
|
@bors r+ p=5 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 33f9c7e has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit 33f9c7e6fe684883c0e54149245d7fc189940768 with merge dc769e14f23510fff06476b4a31bc9b27ec4e4fb... |
Member
|
Oops, I was hoping @oli-obk would get to fix it in time and didn't cancel my r+ 😞. |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
emilyalbini
added
S-waiting-on-author
nikomatsakis
added
the
beta-accepted
…s of the same enum
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=eddyb p=5 sorry about that. Yesterday I had no PC available to me to actually check stuff. |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 195c9f4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
emilyalbini
removed
the
beta-nominated
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…s of the same enum
r? @eddyb
fixes the 2.4 failure of #49765
cc @durka @retep998