HirId-ification, continued#51321

zackmdavis · 2018-06-03T03:59:24Z

Another incremental step towards the vision of #50928 (previously: #50929).

rust-highfive · 2018-06-03T06:04:10Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-3.9 of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

[00:47:17] ...........................................................................i........................
[00:47:22] ....................................................................................................
[00:47:28] ....................................................................................................
[00:47:35] ....................................................................................................
[00:47:40] ........i.................iiiiiiiii...................................................
[00:47:40] 
[00:47:40] travis_fold:start:test_ui_nll
travis_time:start:test_ui_nll
Check compiletest suite=ui mode=ui compare_mode=nll (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
---
[00:48:35] ...........................................................................i........................
[00:48:40] ....................................................................................................
[00:48:45] ....................................................................................................
[00:48:51] ....................................................................................................
[00:48:56] ........i.................iiiiiiiii...................................................
[00:48:56] 
[00:48:56]  finished in 76.529
[00:48:56] travis_fold:end:test_ui_nll

---
travis_time:start:test_mir-opt
Check compiletest suite=mir-opt mode=mir-opt (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
[01:01:35] 
[01:01:35] running 50 tests
[01:01:40] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:03:47Z: compiletest::runtest: None
[01:01:40] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:03:47Z: compiletest::runtest: None
[01:01:41] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:03:48Z: compiletest::runtest: None
[01:01:42] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:03:49Z: compiletest::runtest: None
[01:01:42] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:03:49Z: compiletest::runtest: None
[01:01:53] ERROR 2018-06-03T06:04:01Z: compiletest::runtest: Some("    bb0: {")
  }
[01:01:57]     bb1: {                              
[01:01:57]         falseUnwind -> [real: bb2, cleanup: bb3];
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     bb2: {                              
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_2);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_3);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_4);
[01:01:57]         _4 = std::option::Option<&'36_0rs S<'36_0rs>>::None;
[01:01:57]         _3 = const <std::cell::Cell<T>>::new(move _4) -> [return: bb4, unwind: bb3];
[01:01:57]     bb3: {
[01:01:57]         resume;
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     bb4: {                              
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_4);
[01:01:57]         _2 = S<'36_0rs> { r: move _3 };
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_3);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_6);
[01:01:57]         _6 = &'18s (_2.0: std::cell::Cell<std::option::Option<&'36_0rs S<'36_0rs>>>);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_7);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_8);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_9);
[01:01:57]         _9 = &'36_0rs _2;
[01:01:57]         _8 = &'36_0rs (*_9);
[01:01:57]         _7 = std::option::Option<&'36_0rs S<'36_0rs>>::Some(move _8,);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_8);
[01:01:57]         _5 = const <std::cell::Cell<T>>::set(move _6, move _7) -> [return: bb5, unwind: bb3];
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     bb5: {                              
[01:01:57]         EndRegion('18s);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_7);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_6);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_9);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_11);
[01:01:57]         _11 = const query() -> [return: bb6, unwind: bb3];
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     bb6ased mut _1;
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [(*_6): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10)))]);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Suspend(ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10)))), [(*_6): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10)))]);
[01:01:57]         _5 = &ReErased mut (*_6);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [(*_5): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10)))]);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Release, [_2: (), _3: &ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10))) Test, _5: &ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10))) mut i32]);
[01:01:57]         _2 = const Test::foo(move _3, move _5) -> bb1;
[01:01:57]     bb1: {
[01:01:57]     bb1: {
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [_2: ()]);
[01:01:57]         EndRegion(ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(10))));
[01:01:57] ... (elided)
[01:01:57]         return;
[01:01:57] }
[01:01:57] Actual:
[01:01:57] Actual:
[01:01:57] fn main() -> (){
[01:01:57]     let mut _0: ();
[01:01:57]     scope 1 {
[01:01:57]         scope 3 {
[01:01:57]         scope 4 {
[01:01:57]         scope 4 {
[01:01:57]             let _7: [closure@NodeId(50)];
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     scope 2 {
[01:01:57]     scope 2 {
[01:01:57]         let mut _1: i32;
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     let mut _2: ();
[01:01:57]     let mut _3: &ReErased Test;
[01:01:57]     let mut _4: Test;
[01:01:57]     let mut _5: &ReErased mut i32;
[01:01:57]     let mut _6: &ReErased mut i32;
[01:01:57]     let mut _8: i32;
[01:01:57]     let mut _9: &ReErased [closure@NodeId(50)];
[01:01:57]     let mut _10: (&ReErased mut i32,);
[01:01:57]     let mut _11: &ReErased mut i32;
[01:01:57]     let mut _12: &ReErased mut i32;
[01:01:57]     let mut _13: &ReErased Test;
[01:01:57]     (35)))), [_7: [closure@NodeId(50)]]);
[01:01:57]         _9 = &ReErased _7;
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [(*_9): [closure@NodeId(50)]/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35))) (imm)]);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_10);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_11);
[01:01:57]         StorageLive(_12);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Suspend(ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35)))), [_1: i32]);
[01:01:57]         _12 = &ReErased mut _1;
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [(*_12): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35)))]);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Suspend(ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35)))), [(*_12): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35)))]);
[01:01:57]         _11 = &ReErased mut (*_12);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [(*_11): i32/ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35)))]);
[01:01:57]         _10 = (move _11,);
[01:01:57]         Validate(Release, [_8: i32, _9: &ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35))) [closure@NodeId(50)], _10: (&ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35))) mut i32,)]);
[01:01:57]         _8 = const std::ops::Fn::call(move _9, move _10) -> bb2;
[01:01:57]     }
[01:01:57]     bb2: {                              
[01:01:57]         Validate(Acquire, [_8: i32]);
[01:01:57]         EndRegion(ReScope(Node(ItemLocalId(35))));
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_10);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_11);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_9);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_12);
[01:01:57]         _0 = ();
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_7);
[01:01:57]         StorageDead(_1);
[01:01:57]         return;
[01:01:57] }', tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs:2812:13
[01:01:57] 
[01:01:57] ---- [mir-opt] mir-opt/validate_3.rs stdout ----
[01:0Sun, 03 Jun 2018 06:04:05 GMT

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

michaelwoerister · 2018-06-05T09:53:21Z

r? @eddyb, maybe you could help to fix the mir-opt tests. They probably should use the printed def-path instead of the Debug output of DefId. That would make them a lot more stable.

eddyb · 2018-06-05T10:00:40Z

@michaelwoerister What do you mean? All I'm seeing is changes in scopes, not DefIds.

michaelwoerister · 2018-06-05T10:05:47Z

Sorry, @eddyb, yeah, might be a bug then? I didn't look too hard since I'm on parental leave :)

eddyb · 2018-06-05T10:11:06Z

Maybe one of the calls to next_id() in HIR lowering is now scoped differently and/or one of the variables its result is bound to shadows other variables with the same name.

emilyalbini · 2018-06-18T09:10:35Z

(note for future triage: the author has not so much time for rust at the moment, let's keep this open though #51149 (comment))

bors · 2018-06-18T16:38:31Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #51414) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

zackmdavis · 2018-06-24T04:59:44Z

(most recent rebase just fixes conflicts, tests not expected to pass yet)

rust-highfive · 2018-06-24T05:03:04Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-3.9 of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

bors · 2018-06-28T06:09:36Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #51444) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

For the HirIdification initiative rust-lang#50928.

(The present author fears not being knowledgeable enough to rewrite the comments unilaterally; merely calling it out is a lazy half-measure, but at least doesn't actively make things worse the way an ill-informed rewrite would.)

zackmdavis · 2018-07-02T14:40:35Z

@michaelwoerister Congratulations on the baby!!

@eddyb So, the original version of this PR (which tried to add hir_id fields to all remaining HIR nodes that didn't have them) was trying to do too many things at once, such that I wasn't able to debug it. (I tried redoing the lowering changes from scratch while paying attention to scoping, and I still ended up hitting a broken-MIR assertion.) But it turns out that the later part of the PR making mem_categorization::cmt use a HirId is independently viable, so I've rebased just that, which I think is ready for your review.

eddyb · 2018-07-02T14:58:07Z

@bors r+

bors · 2018-07-02T14:58:08Z

📌 Commit f23d90a has been approved by eddyb

michaelwoerister · 2018-07-02T15:12:40Z

Thanks, @zackmdavis! I'm back from leave now.

bors · 2018-07-02T16:05:00Z

⌛ Testing commit f23d90a with merge b58b721...

@michaelwoerister

HirId-ification, continued Another incremental step towards the vision of #50928 (previously: #50929). r? @michaelwoerister

bors · 2018-07-02T18:09:14Z

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: eddyb
Pushing b58b721 to master...

rust-highfive assigned michaelwoerister Jun 3, 2018

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 3, 2018

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

zackmdavis force-pushed the hiridification_generations branch from b6cbf0b to a0bf8f9 Compare June 3, 2018 05:00

rust-highfive assigned eddyb and unassigned michaelwoerister Jun 5, 2018

zackmdavis mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2018

lint to favor ..= over ... range patterns; migrate to ..= throughout codebase #51149

Merged

zackmdavis force-pushed the hiridification_generations branch from a0bf8f9 to d9bf4d8 Compare June 24, 2018 03:56

zackmdavis added 2 commits July 1, 2018 22:27

use HirId in middle::mem_categorization::cmt_, and consequences of that

735d1bd

For the HirIdification initiative rust-lang#50928.

zackmdavis force-pushed the hiridification_generations branch from d9bf4d8 to f23d90a Compare July 2, 2018 05:29

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 2, 2018

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2018

Auto merge of #51321 - zackmdavis:hiridification_generations, r=eddyb

b58b721

HirId-ification, continued Another incremental step towards the vision of #50928 (previously: #50929). r? @michaelwoerister

bors mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2018

Make custom trait object for Future generic #51944

Merged

bors merged commit f23d90a into rust-lang:master Jul 2, 2018

bors mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2018

Fix various issues with control-flow statements inside anonymous constants #51967

Merged

mati865 mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2018

Update the clippy submodule #51991

Merged

zackmdavis deleted the hiridification_generations branch July 8, 2018 01:59

Uh oh!

Conversation

zackmdavis commented Jun 3, 2018

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-highfive commented Jun 3, 2018

Uh oh!

michaelwoerister commented Jun 5, 2018

Uh oh!

eddyb commented Jun 5, 2018

Uh oh!

michaelwoerister commented Jun 5, 2018

Uh oh!

eddyb commented Jun 5, 2018

Uh oh!

emilyalbini commented Jun 18, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Jun 18, 2018

Uh oh!

zackmdavis commented Jun 24, 2018

Uh oh!

rust-highfive commented Jun 24, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Jun 28, 2018

Uh oh!

zackmdavis commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

eddyb commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

michaelwoerister commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Jul 2, 2018

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants