Enable -mergefunc-use-aliases#56358

nikic · 2018-11-29T22:39:23Z

If the Rust LLVM fork is used, enable the -mergefunc-use-aliases
flag, which will create aliases for merged functions, rather than
inserting a call from one to the other.

A number of codegen tests needed to be adjusted, because functions
that previously fell below the thunk limit are now being merged.
Merging is prevented in various ways now.

I expect that this is going to break something, somewhere, because
it isn't able to deal with aliases properly, but we won't find out
until we try :)

This fixes #52651.

r? @rkruppe

hanna-kruppe

Some nits about some of the updated tests, otherwise LGTM.

cc @rust-lang/compiler for the possibility of regressions from using aliases instead of thunks. Wouldn't mind someone rubberstamping that, otherwise r=me.

hanna-kruppe · 2018-11-29T23:13:41Z

src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm/ffi.rs

I'm surprised we don't have this function already anywhere 🤔

Somewhat surprisingly, there is only a single use of LLVM_RUSTLLVM apart from the one introduced here. I guess the need to know about this from Rust code never came up.

I could also change the code to check for LLVM 8.0 instead and save this function. I only went for the RUSTLLVM check here because this is based on a cherry-picked commit, but ultimately checking for 8.0 would achieve the same and save some churn down the line.

src/test/codegen/export-no-mangle.rs

hanna-kruppe · 2018-11-29T23:16:04Z

src/test/codegen/external-no-mangle-fns.rs

Likewise (-C no-prepopulate-passes).

I've changed the other test to use no-prepopulate-passes, but not sure on this one, as it explicitly specifies -O.

I went ahead and changed this one as well, as I really don't see a reason for it to use -O.

Oh, I missed the -O, but I agree it doesn't seem relevant to the test. Still, cc @alexcrichton in case they remember why they wrote the test that way.

Hm I'm not sure! Me being lazy with the copy/paste is the most likely reason, seems fine to switch it now!

hanna-kruppe · 2018-11-29T23:43:56Z

r=me after squashing if travis passes

If the Rust LLVM fork is used, enable the -mergefunc-use-aliases flag, which will create aliases for merged functions, rather than inserting a call from one to the other. A number of codegen tests needed to be adjusted, because functions that previously fell below the thunk limit are now being merged. Merging is prevented either using -C no-prepopulate-passes, or by making the functions non-identical. I expect that this is going to break something, somewhere, because it isn't able to deal with aliases properly, but we won't find out until we try :) This fixes rust-lang#52651.

estebank · 2018-11-30T02:12:29Z

@bors r=rkruppe

bors · 2018-11-30T02:12:30Z

📌 Commit cbf7489 has been approved by rkruppe

nikic · 2018-12-02T10:02:49Z

@bors r-

Rollup #56430 failed on dist-various-1 with

[00:46:00] LLVM ERROR: Unexpected anonymous function when writing summary

while building stage2 std artifacts for thumbv6m-none-eabi, in particular while compiling compiler_builtins.

We've seen this error a couple of times in conjunction with mergefuncs already...

name-anon-globals should always be run at the very end of the pass pipeline, as optimization passes (in particular mergefunc) may introduce new anonymous globals. I believe we did not run into this earlier because it requires the rather specific combination of a) mergefunc merging two weak functions b) compilation not using thinlto.

nagisa · 2018-12-02T13:49:54Z

@bors delegate+

bors · 2018-12-02T13:49:55Z

✌️ @nikic can now approve this pull request

nikic · 2018-12-02T13:53:35Z

@bors r=rkruppe

We were running name-anon-globals before optimization passes instead of after... That covers the anon globals we introduce ourselves, but not those added by mergefuncs.

bors · 2018-12-02T13:53:36Z

📌 Commit 850d2f1 has been approved by rkruppe

bors · 2018-12-03T02:27:22Z

⌛ Testing commit 850d2f1 with merge a563ceb...

Enable -mergefunc-use-aliases If the Rust LLVM fork is used, enable the -mergefunc-use-aliases flag, which will create aliases for merged functions, rather than inserting a call from one to the other. A number of codegen tests needed to be adjusted, because functions that previously fell below the thunk limit are now being merged. Merging is prevented in various ways now. I expect that this is going to break something, somewhere, because it isn't able to deal with aliases properly, but we won't find out until we try :) This fixes #52651. r? @rkruppe

bors · 2018-12-03T04:52:31Z

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: rkruppe
Pushing a563ceb to master...

@eddyb

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around rust-lang#57356) This commit adds a target option "merge-functions", which takes values in ("disabled", "trampolines", or "aliases" (default is "aliases")), to allow targets to opt out of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass. Additionally, the latest commit also adds an optional -Z flag, "merge-functions", which takes the same values and has precedence over the target option when both are specified. This works around rust-lang#57356. cc @eddyb @japaric @oli-obk @nox @nagisa Also thanks to @denzp and @gnzlbg for discussing this on rust-cuda! ### Motivation Basically, the problem is that the MergeFunctions pass, which rustc currently enables by default at -O2 and -O3 [1], and `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions (specific to the NVPTX target) are currently not compatible with each other. If the MergeFunctions pass is allowed to run, rustc can generate invalid PTX assembly (i.e. a PTX file that is not accepted by the native PTX assembler `ptxas`). Therefore we would like a way to opt out of the MergeFunctions pass, which is what our target option does. ### Related work The current behavior of rustc is to enable MergeFunctions at -O2 and -O3 [1], and also to enable the use of function aliases within MergeFunctions [2] [3]. MergeFunctions seems to have some benefits, such as reducing code size and fixing a crash [4], which is why it is enabled. However, MergeFunctions both with and without function aliases is incompatible with the NVPTX target; a more detailed example for both cases is given below. clang's "solution" is to have a "-fmerge-functions" flag that opts in to the MergeFunctions pass, but it is not enabled by default. ### Examples/more details Consider an example Rust lib using `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore.rs. If we try to compile this with nightly rustc, we get the following compiler error: LLVM ERROR: Module has aliases, which NVPTX does not support. This error happens because: (1) functions `foo` and `bar` have the same body, so are candidates to be merged by MergeFunctions; and (2) rustc configures MergeFunctions to generate function aliases using the "mergefunc-use-aliases" LLVM option [2] [3], but the NVPTX backend does not support those aliases. Okay, so we can try omitting "mergefunc-use-aliases", and then rustc will happily emit PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx. However, this PTX is invalid! When we try to assemble it with `ptxas` (I'm on the CUDA 9.2 toolchain), we get an assembler error: ptxas nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx, line 38; error : Illegal call target, device function expected ptxas fatal : Ptx assembly aborted due to errors What's happening is that MergeFunctions rewrites the `bar` function to call `foo`. However, directly calling an `extern "ptx-kernel"` function from another `extern "ptx-kernel"` is wrong. If we disable the MergeFunctions pass from running at all, rustc generates correct PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-nomergefunc-ok.ptx [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/back/write.rs#L155 [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm_util.rs#L64 [3] rust-lang#56358 [4] rust-lang#49479

@eddyb

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around rust-lang#57356) This commit adds a target option "merge-functions", which takes values in ("disabled", "trampolines", or "aliases" (default is "aliases")), to allow targets to opt out of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass. Additionally, the latest commit also adds an optional -Z flag, "merge-functions", which takes the same values and has precedence over the target option when both are specified. This works around rust-lang#57356. cc @eddyb @japaric @oli-obk @nox @nagisa Also thanks to @denzp and @gnzlbg for discussing this on rust-cuda! ### Motivation Basically, the problem is that the MergeFunctions pass, which rustc currently enables by default at -O2 and -O3 [1], and `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions (specific to the NVPTX target) are currently not compatible with each other. If the MergeFunctions pass is allowed to run, rustc can generate invalid PTX assembly (i.e. a PTX file that is not accepted by the native PTX assembler `ptxas`). Therefore we would like a way to opt out of the MergeFunctions pass, which is what our target option does. ### Related work The current behavior of rustc is to enable MergeFunctions at -O2 and -O3 [1], and also to enable the use of function aliases within MergeFunctions [2] [3]. MergeFunctions seems to have some benefits, such as reducing code size and fixing a crash [4], which is why it is enabled. However, MergeFunctions both with and without function aliases is incompatible with the NVPTX target; a more detailed example for both cases is given below. clang's "solution" is to have a "-fmerge-functions" flag that opts in to the MergeFunctions pass, but it is not enabled by default. ### Examples/more details Consider an example Rust lib using `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore.rs. If we try to compile this with nightly rustc, we get the following compiler error: LLVM ERROR: Module has aliases, which NVPTX does not support. This error happens because: (1) functions `foo` and `bar` have the same body, so are candidates to be merged by MergeFunctions; and (2) rustc configures MergeFunctions to generate function aliases using the "mergefunc-use-aliases" LLVM option [2] [3], but the NVPTX backend does not support those aliases. Okay, so we can try omitting "mergefunc-use-aliases", and then rustc will happily emit PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx. However, this PTX is invalid! When we try to assemble it with `ptxas` (I'm on the CUDA 9.2 toolchain), we get an assembler error: ptxas nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx, line 38; error : Illegal call target, device function expected ptxas fatal : Ptx assembly aborted due to errors What's happening is that MergeFunctions rewrites the `bar` function to call `foo`. However, directly calling an `extern "ptx-kernel"` function from another `extern "ptx-kernel"` is wrong. If we disable the MergeFunctions pass from running at all, rustc generates correct PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-nomergefunc-ok.ptx [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/back/write.rs#L155 [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm_util.rs#L64 [3] rust-lang#56358 [4] rust-lang#49479

@eddyb

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around rust-lang#57356) This commit adds a target option "merge-functions", which takes values in ("disabled", "trampolines", or "aliases" (default is "aliases")), to allow targets to opt out of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass. Additionally, the latest commit also adds an optional -Z flag, "merge-functions", which takes the same values and has precedence over the target option when both are specified. This works around rust-lang#57356. cc @eddyb @japaric @oli-obk @nox @nagisa Also thanks to @denzp and @gnzlbg for discussing this on rust-cuda! ### Motivation Basically, the problem is that the MergeFunctions pass, which rustc currently enables by default at -O2 and -O3 [1], and `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions (specific to the NVPTX target) are currently not compatible with each other. If the MergeFunctions pass is allowed to run, rustc can generate invalid PTX assembly (i.e. a PTX file that is not accepted by the native PTX assembler `ptxas`). Therefore we would like a way to opt out of the MergeFunctions pass, which is what our target option does. ### Related work The current behavior of rustc is to enable MergeFunctions at -O2 and -O3 [1], and also to enable the use of function aliases within MergeFunctions [2] [3]. MergeFunctions seems to have some benefits, such as reducing code size and fixing a crash [4], which is why it is enabled. However, MergeFunctions both with and without function aliases is incompatible with the NVPTX target; a more detailed example for both cases is given below. clang's "solution" is to have a "-fmerge-functions" flag that opts in to the MergeFunctions pass, but it is not enabled by default. ### Examples/more details Consider an example Rust lib using `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore.rs. If we try to compile this with nightly rustc, we get the following compiler error: LLVM ERROR: Module has aliases, which NVPTX does not support. This error happens because: (1) functions `foo` and `bar` have the same body, so are candidates to be merged by MergeFunctions; and (2) rustc configures MergeFunctions to generate function aliases using the "mergefunc-use-aliases" LLVM option [2] [3], but the NVPTX backend does not support those aliases. Okay, so we can try omitting "mergefunc-use-aliases", and then rustc will happily emit PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx. However, this PTX is invalid! When we try to assemble it with `ptxas` (I'm on the CUDA 9.2 toolchain), we get an assembler error: ptxas nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx, line 38; error : Illegal call target, device function expected ptxas fatal : Ptx assembly aborted due to errors What's happening is that MergeFunctions rewrites the `bar` function to call `foo`. However, directly calling an `extern "ptx-kernel"` function from another `extern "ptx-kernel"` is wrong. If we disable the MergeFunctions pass from running at all, rustc generates correct PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-nomergefunc-ok.ptx [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/back/write.rs#L155 [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm_util.rs#L64 [3] rust-lang#56358 [4] rust-lang#49479

@eddyb

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around rust-lang#57356) This commit adds a target option "merge-functions", which takes values in ("disabled", "trampolines", or "aliases" (default is "aliases")), to allow targets to opt out of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass. Additionally, the latest commit also adds an optional -Z flag, "merge-functions", which takes the same values and has precedence over the target option when both are specified. This works around rust-lang#57356. cc @eddyb @japaric @oli-obk @nox @nagisa Also thanks to @denzp and @gnzlbg for discussing this on rust-cuda! ### Motivation Basically, the problem is that the MergeFunctions pass, which rustc currently enables by default at -O2 and -O3 [1], and `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions (specific to the NVPTX target) are currently not compatible with each other. If the MergeFunctions pass is allowed to run, rustc can generate invalid PTX assembly (i.e. a PTX file that is not accepted by the native PTX assembler `ptxas`). Therefore we would like a way to opt out of the MergeFunctions pass, which is what our target option does. ### Related work The current behavior of rustc is to enable MergeFunctions at -O2 and -O3 [1], and also to enable the use of function aliases within MergeFunctions [2] [3]. MergeFunctions seems to have some benefits, such as reducing code size and fixing a crash [4], which is why it is enabled. However, MergeFunctions both with and without function aliases is incompatible with the NVPTX target; a more detailed example for both cases is given below. clang's "solution" is to have a "-fmerge-functions" flag that opts in to the MergeFunctions pass, but it is not enabled by default. ### Examples/more details Consider an example Rust lib using `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore.rs. If we try to compile this with nightly rustc, we get the following compiler error: LLVM ERROR: Module has aliases, which NVPTX does not support. This error happens because: (1) functions `foo` and `bar` have the same body, so are candidates to be merged by MergeFunctions; and (2) rustc configures MergeFunctions to generate function aliases using the "mergefunc-use-aliases" LLVM option [2] [3], but the NVPTX backend does not support those aliases. Okay, so we can try omitting "mergefunc-use-aliases", and then rustc will happily emit PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx. However, this PTX is invalid! When we try to assemble it with `ptxas` (I'm on the CUDA 9.2 toolchain), we get an assembler error: ptxas nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx, line 38; error : Illegal call target, device function expected ptxas fatal : Ptx assembly aborted due to errors What's happening is that MergeFunctions rewrites the `bar` function to call `foo`. However, directly calling an `extern "ptx-kernel"` function from another `extern "ptx-kernel"` is wrong. If we disable the MergeFunctions pass from running at all, rustc generates correct PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-nomergefunc-ok.ptx [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/back/write.rs#L155 [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm_util.rs#L64 [3] rust-lang#56358 [4] rust-lang#49479

@eddyb

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around rust-lang#57356) This commit adds a target option "merge-functions", which takes values in ("disabled", "trampolines", or "aliases" (default is "aliases")), to allow targets to opt out of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass. Additionally, the latest commit also adds an optional -Z flag, "merge-functions", which takes the same values and has precedence over the target option when both are specified. This works around rust-lang#57356. cc @eddyb @japaric @oli-obk @nox @nagisa Also thanks to @denzp and @gnzlbg for discussing this on rust-cuda! ### Motivation Basically, the problem is that the MergeFunctions pass, which rustc currently enables by default at -O2 and -O3 [1], and `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions (specific to the NVPTX target) are currently not compatible with each other. If the MergeFunctions pass is allowed to run, rustc can generate invalid PTX assembly (i.e. a PTX file that is not accepted by the native PTX assembler `ptxas`). Therefore we would like a way to opt out of the MergeFunctions pass, which is what our target option does. ### Related work The current behavior of rustc is to enable MergeFunctions at -O2 and -O3 [1], and also to enable the use of function aliases within MergeFunctions [2] [3]. MergeFunctions seems to have some benefits, such as reducing code size and fixing a crash [4], which is why it is enabled. However, MergeFunctions both with and without function aliases is incompatible with the NVPTX target; a more detailed example for both cases is given below. clang's "solution" is to have a "-fmerge-functions" flag that opts in to the MergeFunctions pass, but it is not enabled by default. ### Examples/more details Consider an example Rust lib using `extern "ptx-kernel"` functions: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore.rs. If we try to compile this with nightly rustc, we get the following compiler error: LLVM ERROR: Module has aliases, which NVPTX does not support. This error happens because: (1) functions `foo` and `bar` have the same body, so are candidates to be merged by MergeFunctions; and (2) rustc configures MergeFunctions to generate function aliases using the "mergefunc-use-aliases" LLVM option [2] [3], but the NVPTX backend does not support those aliases. Okay, so we can try omitting "mergefunc-use-aliases", and then rustc will happily emit PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx. However, this PTX is invalid! When we try to assemble it with `ptxas` (I'm on the CUDA 9.2 toolchain), we get an assembler error: ptxas nocore-mergefunc-nousealiases-bad.ptx, line 38; error : Illegal call target, device function expected ptxas fatal : Ptx assembly aborted due to errors What's happening is that MergeFunctions rewrites the `bar` function to call `foo`. However, directly calling an `extern "ptx-kernel"` function from another `extern "ptx-kernel"` is wrong. If we disable the MergeFunctions pass from running at all, rustc generates correct PTX assembly: https://github.com/peterhj/nvptx-mergefunc-bug/blob/master/nocore-nomergefunc-ok.ptx [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/back/write.rs#L155 [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a36b960df626cbb8bea74f01243318b73f0bd201/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/llvm_util.rs#L64 [3] rust-lang#56358 [4] rust-lang#49479

@nikic

…, r=rkruppe Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8 This functionality is not specific to Rust's LLVM, but any starting in LLVM 8.0, as noted in <rust-lang#56358 (comment)>. cc @nikic r? @rkruppe

@nikic

…, r=rkruppe Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8 This functionality is not specific to Rust's LLVM, but any starting in LLVM 8.0, as noted in <rust-lang#56358 (comment)>. cc @nikic r? @rkruppe

@nikic

…, r=rkruppe Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8 This functionality is not specific to Rust's LLVM, but any starting in LLVM 8.0, as noted in <rust-lang#56358 (comment)>. cc @nikic r? @rkruppe

@nikic

…, r=rkruppe Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8 This functionality is not specific to Rust's LLVM, but any starting in LLVM 8.0, as noted in <rust-lang#56358 (comment)>. cc @nikic r? @rkruppe

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

hanna-kruppe suggested changes Nov 29, 2018

View reviewed changes

nikic force-pushed the mergefunc-aliases branch from 1bbf849 to cbf7489 Compare November 29, 2018 23:53

bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 30, 2018

Centril mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2018

Rollup of 16 pull requests #56428

Closed

Centril mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2018

Rollup of 15 pull requests #56429

Closed

Centril mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2018

Rollup of 16 pull requests #56430

Closed

bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 2, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 2, 2018

Centril mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2018

Rollup of 14 pull requests #56437

Closed

bors merged commit 850d2f1 into rust-lang:master Dec 3, 2018

peterhj mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2019

Add a target option "merge-functions", and a corresponding -Z flag (works around #57356) #57268

Merged

cuviper mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2019

Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8 #60097

Merged

Uh oh!

Conversation

nikic commented Nov 29, 2018

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

hanna-kruppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-kruppe Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nikic Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hanna-kruppe Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nikic Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nikic Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-kruppe Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

alexcrichton Nov 30, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-kruppe commented Nov 29, 2018

Uh oh!

estebank commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

nikic commented Dec 2, 2018

Uh oh!

nagisa commented Dec 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 2, 2018

Uh oh!

nikic commented Dec 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 2, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 3, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 3, 2018

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants