Fix cross-crate visibility of fictive variant constructors#59936
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Apr 14, 2019
Merged
Fix cross-crate visibility of fictive variant constructors#59936bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
Author
|
The alternative is to not change visibilities of the fictive variant constructors from (Of course, what I'd personally like is to un-reserve them already and remove braced variants from value namespace, they've been reserved for years without any concrete plans of use.) |
davidtwco
requested changes
Apr 13, 2019
Member
davidtwco
left a comment
davidtwco
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch! This looks great, just one minor comment.
Centril
reviewed
Apr 13, 2019
src/test/ui/rfc-2008-non-exhaustive/variants_fictive_visibility.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
Author
|
Updated. |
davidtwco
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2019
Member
|
Great, thanks for making those changes! r=me when Travis finishes. |
Contributor
|
@bors r=davidtwco |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit dbc7042 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2019
Fix cross-crate visibility of fictive variant constructors After merging rust-lang#59376 I realized that the code in the decoder wasn't entirely correct - we "decoded" fictive variant constructors with their variant's visibility, which could be public, rather than demoted to `pub(crate)`. Fictive constructors are not directly usable in expression/patterns, but the effect still can be observed with imports. r? @davidtwco
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2019
Fix cross-crate visibility of fictive variant constructors After merging rust-lang#59376 I realized that the code in the decoder wasn't entirely correct - we "decoded" fictive variant constructors with their variant's visibility, which could be public, rather than demoted to `pub(crate)`. Fictive constructors are not directly usable in expression/patterns, but the effect still can be observed with imports. r? @davidtwco
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #59856 (update polonius-engine) - #59877 (HirIdify hir::Def) - #59896 (Remove duplicated redundant spans) - #59900 (Remove [mut] syntax in pin docs) - #59906 (Make BufWriter use get_mut instead of manipulating inner in Write implementation) - #59936 (Fix cross-crate visibility of fictive variant constructors) - #59957 (Add missing backtick to Symbol documentation.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Collaborator
Contributor
|
Why is bor still testing after the PR is merged? |
Contributor
|
@lzutao bors isn't really testing, the message is a bug. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After merging #59376 I realized that the code in the decoder wasn't entirely correct - we "decoded" fictive variant constructors with their variant's visibility, which could be public, rather than demoted to
pub(crate).Fictive constructors are not directly usable in expression/patterns, but the effect still can be observed with imports.
r? @davidtwco