Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation#68223
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation#68223bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit d43615f has been approved by |
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
GitHub has broke spacing in the last commit, you should make is as a fixup to the previous one. |
It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. Co-Authored-By: Mateusz Mikuła <[email protected]>
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 33bc9ef has been approved by |
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is `.6` not `.4`)
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #67780 (Move some queries from rustc::ty to librustc_ty.) - #68096 (Clean up some diagnostics by making them more consistent) - #68223 (Use 3.6 instead of 3.5 in float fract() documentation) - #68265 (Fix some issue numbers of unstable features) - #68266 (Changed docs for f32 and f64.) Failed merges: - #68204 (Use named fields for `{ast,hir}::ItemKind::Impl`) r? @ghost
It is not self-explanatory whether the fract() function inverts the fractional part of negative numbers. This change clarifies this possible question (so that it is
.6not.4)