Conversation
|
@ecstatic-morse shouldn't this also add a regression test for #69313, so we don't hit it again when someone re-attempts doing #69280 ? |
|
@pnkfelix I knew there could be breakage due to #69280. This breakage is allowed since defining We should do a crater run before retrying #69280, although I suspect there will be a lot of regressions due to pinned versions of |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 16790ae has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Resolves #69313 by reverting #69280.
After #69280,
#[rustc_args_required_const(2)]is required on the declaration ofsimd_shuffleintrinsics. This is allowed breakage, since you can't define platform intrinsics on stable. However, the latest release of the widely usedpacked_simdcrate defines these intrinsics without the requisite attribute. Since there's no urgency to merge #69280, let's revert it. We can reconsider when rust-lang/packed_simd#278 is included in a point release ofpacked_simd.r? @petrochenkov