Conversation
Simplify `vec!` macro by replacing 2 following branches: - `($($x:expr),*) => (...)` - `($($x:expr,)*) => (...)` with one: - `($($x:expr),* $(,)?) => (...)`
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
Ugh. This PR brakes ui/vec/vec-macro-with-comma-only, making Should I change the branch pattern to |
|
Assigning semi-randomly.. |
|
We cannot do this due to the |
|
Couldn't we replace the |
|
Oh, I haven't noticed that
|
Fix regression introduced in commit #3ae2d21
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 2c23bd4 has been approved by |
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#70657 (Allow `try`-blocks in places where an open delim is expected) - rust-lang#70947 (tighten CTFE safety net for accesses to globals) - rust-lang#70949 (simplify `vec!` macro) - rust-lang#71002 (fix target & runtool args order) - rust-lang#71082 (ptr: introduce len() method on raw slices) - rust-lang#71128 (Remove unused single_step flag) - rust-lang#71133 (Tighten time complexity on the doc of sort_by_key) - rust-lang#71135 (Update books) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Simplify
vec!macro by replacing 2 following branches:($($x:expr),*) => (...)($($x:expr,)*) => (...)with one:
($($x:expr),* $(,)?) => (...)This is a minor change, however, this will make the documentation cleaner