Better documentation for io::Read::read() return value#72031
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom May 9, 2020
Elinvynia:master
Merged
Better documentation for io::Read::read() return value#72031bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Elinvynia:master
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Elinvynia:master
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup Thanks! I agree this is a good clarification. |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 05fc7fa has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#70834 (Add core::future::{pending,ready}) - rust-lang#71839 (Make BTreeMap::new and BTreeSet::new const) - rust-lang#71890 (Simplify the error Registry methods a little) - rust-lang#71942 (Shrink `LocalDecl`) - rust-lang#71947 (Dead-code pass highlights too much of impl functions) - rust-lang#71981 (Fix `strip-priv-imports` pass name in the rustdoc documentation) - rust-lang#72018 (Fix canonicalization links) - rust-lang#72031 (Better documentation for io::Read::read() return value) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aims to provide the clarity requested in #70360