Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared ? in labeled blocks#72581
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom May 27, 2020
Merged
Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared ? in labeled blocks#72581bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
? in labeled blocks#72581bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @davidtwco (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
samrat
force-pushed
the
allow-desugared-break-in-labeled-block
branch
from
43c0b77 to
91dcbbb
Compare
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 91dcbbb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2020
…eled-block, r=davidtwco Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared `?` in labeled blocks `?` is desugared into a `break` targeting the innermost `try` scope in which it resides. The `break` however will not have a label. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_ast_lowering/expr.rs#L1560 Since the `target` of the `break` is known, the compiler should not complain about an unlabeled jump for `break`s desugared from `?`. Closes rust-lang#72483
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72270 (add a lint against references to packed fields) - rust-lang#72294 (JS cleanup) - rust-lang#72342 (Warn about unused crate deps) - rust-lang#72401 (Use correct function for detecting `const fn` in unsafety checking) - rust-lang#72581 (Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared `?` in labeled blocks) - rust-lang#72592 (Update books) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
?is desugared into abreaktargeting the innermosttryscope in which it resides. Thebreakhowever will not have a label. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_ast_lowering/expr.rs#L1560Since the
targetof thebreakis known, the compiler should not complain about an unlabeled jump forbreaks desugared from?.Closes #72483