Remove links to rejected errata 4406 for RFC 4291#74742
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jul 30, 2020
Merged
Remove links to rejected errata 4406 for RFC 4291#74742bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Contributor
|
The link is under the "See Also" header, it is not linked as a normative reference. Why should it be removed from there? Doesn't it provide a useful insight? |
Contributor
Author
|
Hum, maybe adding a note explicitly marking it as rejected would be better ? Right now it's not easy to see it and can easily be misunderstood. |
6b37e0f to
fe99f4f
Compare
nikomatsakis
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2020
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit fe99f4f7482b40f08dd5f5eb26eee5c6128bb2b8 has been approved by |
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #73265) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
fe99f4f to
90d0052
Compare
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 90d0052 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2020
…arth Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#74742 (Remove links to rejected errata 4406 for RFC 4291) - rust-lang#74819 (Point towards `format_spec`; it is in other direction) - rust-lang#74852 (Explain why inlining default ToString impl) - rust-lang#74869 (Make closures and generators a must use types) - rust-lang#74873 (symbol mangling: use ty::print::Print for consts) - rust-lang#74902 (Remove deprecated unstable `{Box,Rc,Arc}::into_raw_non_null` functions) - rust-lang#74904 (Fix some typos in src/librustdoc/clean/auto_trait.rs) - rust-lang#74910 (fence docs: fix example Mutex) - rust-lang#74912 (Fix broken link in unstable book `plugin`) - rust-lang#74927 (Change the target data layout to specify more values) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #74198.
For now I simply removed the links, the docs seems clear enough to me but I'm no expert in the domain so don't hesitate to correct me if more is needed.
cc @ghanan94.
@rustbot modify labels: T-doc, T-libs