Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
7d875f2 to
427b906
Compare
427b906 to
0ef2666
Compare
m-ou-se
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good!
Can you open a tracking issue for the is_subnormal feature, and add its number in the unstable attributes in this PR?
|
Somehow didn't notice that this had feedback! Was about to bug the thread again and see what was holding this up. Will make those changes right now. :) |
0ef2666 to
b71f91a
Compare
|
Rebased, filed tracking issue, and made the suggested change. Was waiting on a confirmation that this would be good to implement before I filed a tracking issue, since I didn't want to file something for a not-yet-approved change. Let me know if you need anything else before merging. :) |
Yeah that's good. :)
I don't see the changes in this PR though. Did you push the right commit? |
b71f91a to
cf26f2f
Compare
|
I in fact, did not commit the changes I made. -______- Pushed. |
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit cf26f2f has been approved by |
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76941 (Add f{32,64}::is_subnormal) - rust-lang#77697 (Split each iterator adapter and source into individual modules) - rust-lang#78305 (Stabilize alloc::Layout const functions) - rust-lang#78608 (Stabilize refcell_take) - rust-lang#78793 (Clean up `StructuralEq` docs) - rust-lang#79267 (BTreeMap: address namespace conflicts) - rust-lang#79293 (Add test for eval order for a+=b) - rust-lang#79295 (BTreeMap: fix minor testing mistakes in rust-lang#78903) - rust-lang#79297 (BTreeMap: swap the names of NodeRef::new and Root::new_leaf) - rust-lang#79299 (Stabilise `then`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The docs recommend that you use dedicated methods instead of calling
classifydirectly, although there isn't actually a way of checking if a number is subnormal without calling classify. There are dedicated methods for all other forms, excludingis_zero(which is just== 0.0anyway).