Recognize private_intra_doc_links as a lint#78114
Conversation
|
Because it's a rustdoc-exclusive lint and is otherwise only declared in rustdoc code @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit f2078877f230567d5ddbcabdf5b6016f5979e204 has been approved by |
|
@bors r- This causes the tests to fail and I don't understand why: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Rustdoc has its own lint list. In Line 251 in 8ae3b50 Line 337 in 8ae3b50 Though I don't get the double check in Line 350 in 8ae3b50 Anyway, I think adding the lint to |
|
@oli-obk The check you linked is to prevent some lints to be allowed by default iirc. |
Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ```
|
I think the right fix here is to never silence lints from the How do I get the rustdoc lint group? I found |
|
Queries::register_plugins looks right, but rustdoc only has access to Is there really no simpler way to do this? |
This is really starting to get out of hand. Rustdoc should instead allow all lints in the rustdoc lint group.
|
I changed this to hard-code the lints for now, but I'd really like to fix this at some point. |
|
@bors r+ yea, let's get this landed for now. |
|
📌 Commit 47b21b8 has been approved by |
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? `@Manishearth` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ``@Manishearth`` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ```@Manishearth``` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ````@Manishearth```` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? `````@Manishearth````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ``````@Manishearth`````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ```````@Manishearth``````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#77640 (Refactor IntErrorKind to avoid "underflow" terminology) - rust-lang#78026 (Define `fs::hard_link` to not follow symlinks.) - rust-lang#78114 (Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint) - rust-lang#78228 (Promote aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu to Tier 1) - rust-lang#78345 (Fix handling of item names for HIR) - rust-lang#78437 (BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place) - rust-lang#78476 (fix some incorrect aliasing in the BTree) - rust-lang#78674 (inliner: Use substs_for_mir_body) - rust-lang#78748 (Implement destructuring assignment for tuples) - rust-lang#78868 (Fix tab focus on restyled switches) - rust-lang#78878 (Avoid overlapping cfg attributes when both macOS and aarch64) - rust-lang#78882 (Nicer hunk headers for rust files) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Previously, trying to allow this would give another error!
Fixes the issue found in #77249 (comment).
r? @Manishearth
Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.