Clean up outdated use_once_payload pretty printer comment#79013
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Nov 15, 2020
Merged
Clean up outdated use_once_payload pretty printer comment#79013bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
use_once_payload pretty printer comment#79013bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
While reading some parts of the pretty printer code, I noticed this old comment which seemed out of place. The `use_once_payload` this outdated comment mentions was removed in 2017 in 40f03a1, so this completes the work by removing the comment.
Contributor
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit bd0fba2 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#78352 (Do not call `unwrap` with `signatures` option enabled) - rust-lang#78590 (refactor: removing alloc::collections::vec_deque ignore-tidy-filelength) - rust-lang#78848 (Bump minimal supported LLVM version to 9) - rust-lang#78856 (Explicitly checking for or-pattern before test) - rust-lang#78948 (test: add `()=()=()=...` to weird-exprs.rs) - rust-lang#78962 (Add a test for r# identifiers) - rust-lang#78963 (Added some unit tests as requested) - rust-lang#78966 (Never inline C variadics, cold functions, functions with incompatible attributes ...) - rust-lang#78968 (Include llvm-as in llvm-tools-preview component) - rust-lang#78969 (Normalize function type during validation) - rust-lang#78980 (Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input) - rust-lang#78986 (Avoid installing external LLVM dylibs) - rust-lang#78988 (Fix an intrinsic invocation on threaded wasm) - rust-lang#78993 (rustc_target: Fix dash vs underscore mismatches in option names) - rust-lang#79013 (Clean up outdated `use_once_payload` pretty printer comment) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reading some parts of the pretty printer code, I noticed this old comment
which seemed out of place. The
use_once_payloadthis outdated comment mentionswas removed in 2017 in 40f03a1, so this
completes the work by removing the comment.