Fix commit detected when using download-rustc#82740
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Mar 4, 2021
Merged
Conversation
On reflection on the issue in rust-lang#79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the `compiler/` filter, not using `--author=bors`. rust-lang@9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup: ``` $ curl -I https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/96e843ce6ae42e0aa519ba45e148269de347fd84/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz HTTP/2 404 ``` So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what `--author=bors` does: $ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5 commit 9a1d617 Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to `compiler/`", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, but - Redownloading isn't the end of the world, - That metric is hard to implement, and - Documentation-only or library-only changes are very rare anyway since they're usually rolled up with changes to the compiler.
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit a705a58 has been approved by |
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Member
Author
|
Seems spurious? @GuillaumeGomez do you recognize this error? |
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2021
…acrum Fix commit detected when using `download-rustc` On reflection on the issue in rust-lang#79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the `compiler/` filter, not using `--author=bors`. rust-lang@9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup: ``` $ curl -I https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/96e843ce6ae42e0aa519ba45e148269de347fd84/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz HTTP/2 404 ``` So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what `--author=bors` does: $ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5 commit 9a1d617 Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to `compiler/`", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, but - Redownloading isn't the end of the world, - That metric is hard to implement, and - Documentation-only or library-only changes are very rare anyway since they're usually rolled up with changes to the compiler. Helps with rust-lang#81930. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Member
|
That's definitely spurious. @bors: retry |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80527 (Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in) - rust-lang#82310 (Load rustdoc's JS search index on-demand.) - rust-lang#82315 (Improve page load performance in rustdoc) - rust-lang#82564 (Revert `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` impl to prevent pointers invalidation) - rust-lang#82697 (Fix stabilization version of move_ref_pattern) - rust-lang#82717 (Account for macros when suggesting adding lifetime) - rust-lang#82740 (Fix commit detected when using `download-rustc`) - rust-lang#82744 (Pass `CrateNum` by value instead of by reference) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
13 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On reflection on the issue in #79540 (comment), I think the bug was actually using the
compiler/filter, not using--author=bors. 9a1d617 has no CI artifacts because it was merged as part of a rollup:So 9a1d617 is the correct commit to download, and that's what
--author=borsdoes:$ git log --author=bors 4aec8a5
commit 9a1d617
Ideally it would look for "the most recent bors commit not followed by a change to
compiler/", which would exclude things like documentation changes and avoid redownloading more than necessary, butHelps with #81930.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum