rustdoc- dont ICE on ConstEvaluatable predicates#86242
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 16, 2021
Merged
rustdoc- dont ICE on ConstEvaluatable predicates#86242bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
ConstEvaluatable predicates#86242bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @ollie27 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jyn514
reviewed
Jun 12, 2021
Member
|
@lcnr @Aaron1011 do one of you happen to have time to review this? I don't know anything about how ConstEvaluable works. |
Member
Author
|
lcnr wont be able to review they're taking break from rustc stuff |
Member
|
The test looks good to me (assuming CI passes) :) I'd still prefer someone else reviews the actual change. |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 94de92d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
…ce, r=oli-obk rustdoc- dont ICE on `ConstEvaluatable` predicates Fixes rust-lang#77647 rustdoc doesn't need to be handling these as you cant write them, they just get added implicitly when you write a where clause containing an expression.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#85283 (Avoid possible filename collision in coverage tests) - rust-lang#86200 (Updates `Clone` docs for `Copy` comparison.) - rust-lang#86209 (fix minor wording/typo issues in core::option docs) - rust-lang#86242 (rustdoc- dont ICE on `ConstEvaluatable` predicates) - rust-lang#86280 (Add a regression test for issue-76510) - rust-lang#86293 (Allow to run only a few GUI tests) - rust-lang#86327 (Don't mark "safe" intrinsics as unsafe) - rust-lang#86345 (Remove some duplicate `char` assoc items on RELEASES.md) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jyn514
added
the
T-rustdoc
16 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #77647
rustdoc doesn't need to be handling these as you cant write them, they just get added implicitly when you write a where clause containing an expression.