Simplify future incompatible reporting.#87070
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jul 13, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @oli-obk (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
I'm surprised we have no local tests. I'm assuming there are tests in cargo? If so r=me |
Contributor
Author
|
There are tests in cargo, but they are disabled. #86478 is intended to fix that, which contains a primitive test, but it needs a reviewer. Perhaps you could look at that, too? |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ looking at the linked PR now |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 4d1daf8 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#86344 (Split MaybeUninit::write into new feature gate and stabilize it) - rust-lang#86811 (Remove unstable `io::Cursor::remaining`) - rust-lang#86846 (stdio_locked: add tracking issue) - rust-lang#86887 (rustdoc: remove dead code in `clean`) - rust-lang#87007 (Fix rust-analyzer install when not available.) - rust-lang#87035 (Fix implementors display) - rust-lang#87065 (Fix ICE with unsized type in const pattern) - rust-lang#87070 (Simplify future incompatible reporting.) - rust-lang#87077 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#87078 (Rustdoc: suggest removing disambiguator if linking to field) - rust-lang#87089 (CTFE engine: small cleanups) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
rustc_session: Remove lint store from `Session` It was added in rust-lang#75534, but after the cleanup in rust-lang#87070 it's no longer necessary.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
rustc_session: Remove lint store from `Session` It was added in rust-lang#75534, but after the cleanup in rust-lang#87070 it's no longer necessary.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This simplifies the implementation of the future incompatible reporting system. Instead of having a separate field in the future_incompatible definition, this reuses the
FutureIncompatibilityReasonenum. It also drops the "date" field. Cargo does not use the date field, and there isn't much of a need for this to be structured, and I am skeptical that the date can be predicted reliably. The date or release version can be listed in the lint text if desired.