Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift#89092
Merged
bors merged 59 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Sep 27, 2021
Merged
Conversation
The new implementation allows some `memcpy`s to be optimized away, so the uninit value in ui/sanitize/memory.rs is constructed directly onto the return place. Therefore the sanitizer now says that the value is allocated by `main` rather than `random`.
…ation processing.
This reverts commit 3b22c3a. Seems to be necessary after all. At least when compiling regex.
…komatsakis Trait upcasting coercion (part 3) By using separate candidates for each possible choice, this fixes type-checking issues in previous commits. r? `@nikomatsakis`
…ence of --remap-path-prefix.
One wasn't necessary anymore at all. Others are only necessary when jit mode is enabled.
Introduce NullOp::AlignOf This PR introduces `Rvalue::NullaryOp(NullOp::AlignOf, ty)`, which will be lowered from `align_of`, similar to `size_of` lowering to `Rvalue::NullaryOp(NullOp::SizeOf, ty)`. The changes are originally part of rust-lang#88700 but since it's not dependent on other changes and could have performance impact on its own, it's separated into its own PR.
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ subtree sync |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 86f9bcf has been approved by |
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit 86f9bcf with merge 02bd9770fa71052455a63168e6816885438cf05d... |
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Member
Author
|
Spurious network error @bors retry |
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Sep 27, 2021
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (b280465): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2021
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift Nothing exciting this time. Mostly internal refactorings. r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Nothing exciting this time. Mostly internal refactorings.
r? @ghost
@rustbot label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler